-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8292692: Move MethodCounters inline functions out of method.hpp #15094
Conversation
👋 Welcome back matsaave! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@matias9927 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
7cb28af
to
ce2d516
Compare
f5ee1d9
to
d2a0d04
Compare
fad0349
to
dcffac7
Compare
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
@matias9927 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 25 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Just one nit.
mcs->clear_number_of_breakpoints(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
#endif |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion:
#endif // INCLUDE_JVMTI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. I submitted tier1 testing which includes different builds (I don't see link to testing in RFE).
Thank you for the reviews @calvinccheung, @iklam, and @vnkozlov! |
Going to push as commit 683672c.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@matias9927 Pushed as commit 683672c. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The inline functions related to MethodCounters in method.hpp can be moved to the inline file to reduce the number of includes. Verified with tier 1-5 tests.
Below is a comparison of the old and new include statistics:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15094/head:pull/15094
$ git checkout pull/15094
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15094
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15094/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15094
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15094
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15094.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment