Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8313421: [JVMCI] avoid locking class loader in CompilerToVM.lookupType #15128

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dougxc
Copy link
Member

@dougxc dougxc commented Aug 2, 2023

This PR removes the need to lock the system class loader when converting Class instances for boot and platform classes to ResolvedJavaType objects. Not only is the system class loader a suboptimal loader for resolving these classes but locking it can cause deadlock in some JDK tests (e.g. test/jdk/java/lang/System/LoggerFinder/) when run with -Xcomp. For example, a thread that holds the system class loader lock and triggers a blocking compilation will deadlock with the compiler thread servicing the compilation if the compilation requires calling CompilerToVM.lookupType (which most compilations do).


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8313421: [JVMCI] avoid locking class loader in CompilerToVM.lookupType (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15128/head:pull/15128
$ git checkout pull/15128

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15128
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15128/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15128

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15128

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15128.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 2, 2023

👋 Welcome back dnsimon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 2, 2023

@dougxc The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • graal
  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org labels Aug 2, 2023
@dougxc dougxc changed the title JDK-8313421: [JVMCI] avoid locking class loader in CompilerToVM.lookupType 8313421: [JVMCI] avoid locking class loader in CompilerToVM.lookupType Aug 2, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@tkrodriguez tkrodriguez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks looks like a nice cleanup

@dougxc dougxc marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2023 08:29
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 3, 2023

@dougxc This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8313421: [JVMCI] avoid locking class loader in CompilerToVM.lookupType

Reviewed-by: never, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 3, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 3, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me but I'm not an expert in this code.

@dougxc
Copy link
Member Author

dougxc commented Aug 10, 2023

Thanks for the reviews.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Going to push as commit 83adaf5.
Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 10, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 10, 2023

@dougxc Pushed as commit 83adaf5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants