Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8282712: VMConnection.open() does not detect if VM failed to be created, resulting in NPE #15255

Closed

Conversation

plummercj
Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj commented Aug 12, 2023

VMConnection.open() expects launchTarget(), attachTarget(), and listentTarget() to either throw an exception or return a valid VirtualMachine instance. Instead they were catching certain exceptions and returning null, which resulted in an NPE in VMConnection.open(). I've fixed it so these APIs now rethrow any caught exception and never return null.

Tested with tier1 and also running the following 10x each on linux-x64, macosx-aarch64, and windows-x64:

test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/
test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/
test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdi
test/jdk/com/sun/jdi


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8282712: VMConnection.open() does not detect if VM failed to be created, resulting in NPE (Bug - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15255/head:pull/15255
$ git checkout pull/15255

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15255
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15255/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15255

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15255

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15255.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 12, 2023

👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8282712 8282712: VMConnection.open() does not detect if VM failed to be created, resulting in NPE Aug 12, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 12, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 12, 2023

@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 12, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 12, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay.
Should the bug have the label "noreg-self"?
Thanks,
Serguei

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 14, 2023

@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8282712: VMConnection.open() does not detect if VM failed to be created, resulting in NPE

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, amenkov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 113 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f143380: 8314240: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs/pkcs7/SignerOrder.java fails to compile
  • 6b396da: 8062795: (fs) Files.setPermissions requires read access when NOFOLLOW_LINKS specified
  • 7b28d36: 8314330: java/foreign tests should respect vm flags when start new processes
  • b32d641: 8311943: Cleanup usages of toLowerCase() and toUpperCase() in java.base
  • 13f6450: 8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size)
  • 24e896d: 8310275: Bug in assignment operator of ReservedMemoryRegion
  • 1925508: 8314144: gc/g1/ihop/TestIHOPStatic.java fails due to extra concurrent mark with -Xcomp
  • b80001d: 8314209: Wrong @SInCE tag for RandomGenerator::equiDoubles
  • ef6db5c: 8314211: Add NativeLibraryUnload event
  • 49ddb19: 8313760: [REDO] Enhance AES performance
  • ... and 103 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/87b08b6e0192d88025c2275c7dd2c4bdecda58e8...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 14, 2023
@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should the bug have the label "noreg-self"?

There are two fixes of almost identical code. One is in test infra code, and thus maybe a noreg-self is warranted, but the other is in jdb, so I'm not sure what is best in that case.

@sspitsyn
Copy link
Contributor

Should the bug have the label "noreg-self"?

There are two fixes of almost identical code. One is in test infra code, and thus maybe a noreg-self is warranted, but the other is in jdb, so I'm not sure what is best in that case.

You are right. Part of this is in jdb, so no label is needed.

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping! I could use one more review please. Thanks

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you Alex and Serguei!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 17, 2023

Going to push as commit 388dcff.
Since your change was applied there have been 124 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e8f6b3e: 8314268: Missing include in assembler_riscv.hpp
  • c634bdf: 8314444: Update jib-profiles.js to use JMH 1.37 devkit
  • 2b81885: 8314071: Test java/foreign/TestByteBuffer.java timed out
  • 32efd23: 8311939: Excessive allocation of Matcher.groups array
  • ed585d1: 8314280: StructuredTaskScope.shutdown should document that the state of completing subtasks is not defined
  • 6f1071f: 8314213: DocLint should warn about unknown standard tags
  • 4331193: 8314423: Multiple patterns without unnamed variables
  • 249dc37: 8314321: Remove unused field jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Attrs.mAttrIdx
  • b78f5a1: 8314076: ICC_ColorSpace#minVal/maxVal have the opposite description
  • 2a1176b: 8314276: Improve PtrQueue API around size/capacity
  • ... and 114 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/87b08b6e0192d88025c2275c7dd2c4bdecda58e8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 17, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 17, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 17, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 17, 2023

@plummercj Pushed as commit 388dcff.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants