Skip to content

8314321: Remove unused field jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Attrs.mAttrIdx #15298

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Aug 15, 2023

A field char mAttrIdx in the jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Attrs class is unused and can be removed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8314321: Remove unused field jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Attrs.mAttrIdx (Enhancement - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15298/head:pull/15298
$ git checkout pull/15298

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15298
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15298/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15298

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15298

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15298.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 15, 2023

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 15, 2023

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 15, 2023
@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Remove unused field jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Attrs.mAttrIdx 8314321: Remove unused field jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Attrs.mAttrIdx Aug 15, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 15, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 15, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 16, 2023

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8314321: Remove unused field jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Attrs.mAttrIdx

Reviewed-by: alanb, vtewari, bpb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 17 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 13f6450: 8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size)
  • 24e896d: 8310275: Bug in assignment operator of ReservedMemoryRegion
  • 1925508: 8314144: gc/g1/ihop/TestIHOPStatic.java fails due to extra concurrent mark with -Xcomp
  • b80001d: 8314209: Wrong @SInCE tag for RandomGenerator::equiDoubles
  • ef6db5c: 8314211: Add NativeLibraryUnload event
  • 49ddb19: 8313760: [REDO] Enhance AES performance
  • d46f0fb: 8313720: C2 SuperWord: wrong result with -XX:+UseVectorCmov -XX:+UseCMoveUnconditionally
  • 38687f1: 8314262: GHA: Cut down cross-compilation sysroots deeper
  • a602624: 8314020: Print instruction blocks in byte units
  • 0b12480: 8314233: C2: assert(assertion_predicate_has_loop_opaque_node(iff)) failed: unexpected
  • ... and 7 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f23995465767fa7319d2f6fac62b6ec74c0e4986...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@vyommani vyommani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me.

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 17, 2023

Going to push as commit 249dc37.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b78f5a1: 8314076: ICC_ColorSpace#minVal/maxVal have the opposite description
  • 2a1176b: 8314276: Improve PtrQueue API around size/capacity
  • 0c3bc71: 8281169: Expand discussion of elements and types
  • f143380: 8314240: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs/pkcs7/SignerOrder.java fails to compile
  • 6b396da: 8062795: (fs) Files.setPermissions requires read access when NOFOLLOW_LINKS specified
  • 7b28d36: 8314330: java/foreign tests should respect vm flags when start new processes
  • b32d641: 8311943: Cleanup usages of toLowerCase() and toUpperCase() in java.base
  • 13f6450: 8313765: Invalid CEN header (invalid zip64 extra data field size)
  • 24e896d: 8310275: Bug in assignment operator of ReservedMemoryRegion
  • 1925508: 8314144: gc/g1/ihop/TestIHOPStatic.java fails due to extra concurrent mark with -Xcomp
  • ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f23995465767fa7319d2f6fac62b6ec74c0e4986...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 17, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 17, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 17, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 17, 2023

@turbanoff Pushed as commit 249dc37.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants