-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8237542: JMapHeapConfigTest.java doesn't work with negative jlong values #15368
Conversation
👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@plummercj The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
/label remove core-libs |
@plummercj |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks,
Serguei
@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 40 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(size_t)-1
is a weird value to pass, which requires this gymnastics in the output code.
But I guess this is as good as it gets for the test-side fix.
Please test with all current GCs? We have seen regressions in this test with Shenandoah previously.
Passed with G1, Z, ZGenerational, Shenandoah, Serial, and Parallel. |
thanks you for the reviews Serguei and Aleksey! /integrate |
Going to push as commit 8a5db6b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@plummercj Pushed as commit 8a5db6b. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The test tries to match up various GC -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal values with the output of jhsdb -jmap --pid --heap. With ZGC, MaxNewSize set to (size_t)-1, but PrintFlagsFinal prints it as an unsigned long:
jmap normally prints out both the raw size and the MB size. For example:
MaxHeapSize = 805306368 (768.0MB)
But as part of the fix for JDK-6718125, it stopped printing the raw value for negative values an only printed the MB value. So for MaxNewSize we had:
Instead of:
So the test fails to find 18446744073709551615 in the output. I fixed jmap to include the raw value as an unsigned long, even if negative as a signed long (to be consistent with PrintFlagsFinal output), so now the test passes even when MaxNewSize is included in the list.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15368/head:pull/15368
$ git checkout pull/15368
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15368
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15368/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15368
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15368
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15368.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment