8310454: Introduce static-libs-graal bundle

[erikj79]

JDK-8307858 added libjvm.a to the set of static-libs in the static-libs image and subsequently the static-libs bundle. The main user of the existing static-image was the graal build, which doesn't need libjvm. Since libjvm is considerably bigger than all the other libraries, a static-libs-graal-image was introduced to cover the graal build usecase. There was no corresponding bundles target added however, so for graal builds depending on stored/published bundles, there is no way of skipping out of libjvm.

To fix this, this patch introduces a new make target: static-libs-graal-bundles.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8310454: Introduce static-libs-graal bundle (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Jiangli Zhou (@jianglizhou - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15406/head:pull/15406
$ git checkout pull/15406

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15406
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15406/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15406

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15406

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15406.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back erikj! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@erikj79 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (cd05ca9c)

[jianglizhou]

Hi @erikj79 This looks good to me from static-libs point of view. Thanks for tying the loose ends introduced by JDK-8307858.

[openjdk]

@erikj79 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8310454: Introduce static-libs-graal bundle

Reviewed-by: jiangli

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• d9fc6b6: 8314759: VirtualThread.parkNanos timeout adjustment when pinned should be replaced
• acaab6f: 8306040: HttpResponseInputStream.available() returns 1 on empty stream
• 76b9011: 8314656: GHA: No need for Debian ports keyring installation after JDK-8313701
• e36620d: 8314554: Debian/Ubuntu should not link OpenJDK with --as-needed link option
• 97b94cb: 8314883: Java_java_util_prefs_FileSystemPreferences_lockFile0 write result errno in missing case
• 75e19e0: 8314819: [JVMCI] HotSpotJVMCIRuntime.lookupType throws unexpected ClassNotFoundException
• c418933: 8313530: VM build without C2 fails after JDK-8312579
• de0e46c: 8303815: Improve Metaspace test speed
• 3699666: 8313319: [linux] mmap should use MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE if available
• 3285a1e: 8314555: Build with mawk fails on Windows
• ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/68815d54c199d39b14034c926777b492fa453a22...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[erikj79]

Thanks for the review!

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 3201623.
Since your change was applied there have been 22 commits pushed to the master branch:

• e9ba8d5: 8314960: Add Certigna Root CA - 2
• 837cf85: 8312547: Max/Min nodes Value implementation could be improved
• 7342f5a: 8314333: Update com/sun/jdi/ProcessAttachTest.java to use ProcessTools.createTestJvm(..)
• f139f30: 8315033: Problemlist java/lang/template/StringTemplateTest.java
• f2383b3: 8314063: The socket is not closed in Connection::createSocket when the handshake failed for LDAP connection
• dcd6e75: 8314990: Generational ZGC: Strong OopStorage stats reported as weak roots
• 002b594: 8312749: Generational ZGC: Tests crash with assert(index == 0 || is_power_of_2(index))
• d024059: 8314951: VM build without C2 still fails after JDK-8313530
• 2624324: 8219567: Name of first parameter of RandomAccessFile(String,String) is inconsistent
• 8e4240c: 8314850: SharedRuntime::handle_wrong_method() gets called too often when resolving Continuation.enter
• ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/68815d54c199d39b14034c926777b492fa453a22...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@erikj79 Pushed as commit 3201623.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.