Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8314834: serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags #15457

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lmesnik
Copy link
Member

@lmesnik lmesnik commented Aug 28, 2023

The test is fixed to start debuggee with tested VM options.
Verified with tier1, running svc tests with different vm flags and virtual thread.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8314834: serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15457/head:pull/15457
$ git checkout pull/15457

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15457
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15457/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15457

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15457

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15457.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 28, 2023

👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 28, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 28, 2023

@lmesnik The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 28, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay.
Thanks,
Serguei

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 29, 2023

@lmesnik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8314834: serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 17 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e22762c: 8314932: G1: Fix -Wconversion warnings for simple cases inside g1 folder
  • 762b652: 8314573: G1: Heap resizing at Remark does not take existing eden regions into account
  • a4e97aa: 8314753: Remove support for @beaninfo, @todo, @since.unbundled, and @note
  • 5cc64cc: 8309463: IGV: Dynamic graph layout algorithm
  • 1d02507: 8314476: TestJstatdPortAndServer.java failed with "java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: no such object in table"
  • 93188bd: 8314569: (fs) Improve normalization of UnixPath for input with trailing slashes
  • 8b8182d: 8315087: G1: Use uint for G1 flags indicating percentage
  • 3dc266c: 8315070: RISC-V: Clean up platform dependent inline headers
  • 25f5df2: 8315073: Zero build on macOS fails after JDK-8303852
  • a03954e: 8309697: [TESTBUG] Remove "@requires vm.flagless" from jtreg vectorization tests
  • ... and 7 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/99ea8bf2b962011e57d02a93217d65d7259e8f80...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 29, 2023
@lmesnik
Copy link
Member Author

lmesnik commented Aug 30, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Going to push as commit 8e4cda0.
Since your change was applied there have been 31 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1ea6463: 8314835: gtest wrappers should be marked as flagless
  • 93e82c0: 8314824: Fix serviceability/jvmti/8036666/GetObjectLockCount.java to use vm flags
  • 7daae1f: 8314263: Signed jars triggering Logger finder recursion and StackOverflowError
  • 6701eba: 8315117: Update Zlib Data Compression Library to Version 1.3
  • e29f0c2: 8297777: Convert jdk.jlink StringSharingPlugin to use Class File API
  • bf63945: 8298992: runtime/NMT/SummarySanityCheck.java failed with "Total committed (MMMMMM) did not match the summarized committed (NNNNNN)"
  • cb3f968: 8314651: G1: Fix -Wconversion warnings in static fields of HeapRegion
  • 876a725: 8315206: RISC-V: hwprobe query is_set return wrong value
  • ed1ea5f: 8314024: SIGSEGV in PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work due to bad immediate dominator info
  • f3aeb02: 8315213: java/lang/ProcessHandle/TreeTest.java test enhance output of children
  • ... and 21 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/99ea8bf2b962011e57d02a93217d65d7259e8f80...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 30, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 30, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 30, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2023

@lmesnik Pushed as commit 8e4cda0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
2 participants