Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8315242: G1: Fix -Wconversion warnings around GCDrainStackTargetSize #15472

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Aug 29, 2023

Use more precise type and range for GCDrainStackTargetSize.

The change to TASKQUEUE_SIZE is there, because they are used in the same MIN2. (All uses expect TASKQUEUE_SIZE to be uint as well.)


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8315242: G1: Fix -Wconversion warnings around GCDrainStackTargetSize (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15472/head:pull/15472
$ git checkout pull/15472

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15472
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15472/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15472

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15472

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15472.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 29, 2023

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8315242 8315242: G1: Fix -Wconversion warnings around GCDrainStackTargetSize Aug 29, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 29, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 29, 2023

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 29, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 29, 2023

Webrevs

"Number of entries we will try to leave on the stack " \
"during parallel gc") \
range(0, max_juint) \
range(0, (max_juint-1)/2) \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
range(0, (max_juint-1)/2) \
range(0, (UINT_MAX - 1) / 2) \

Avoid using juint_* in code not interfacing java. Also the \ is indented improperly, and even in above suggestion it might still be.

@@ -684,10 +684,10 @@
develop(uintx, GCExpandToAllocateDelayMillis, 0, \
"Delay between expansion and allocation (in milliseconds)") \
\
product(uintx, GCDrainStackTargetSize, 64, \
product(uint, GCDrainStackTargetSize, 64, \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
product(uint, GCDrainStackTargetSize, 64, \
product(uint, GCDrainStackTargetSize, 64, \

if (partially) {
target_size = MIN2((size_t)_task_queue->max_elems()/3, GCDrainStackTargetSize);
target_size = MIN2(_task_queue->max_elems()/3, GCDrainStackTargetSize);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
target_size = MIN2(_task_queue->max_elems()/3, GCDrainStackTargetSize);
target_size = MIN2(_task_queue->max_elems() / 3, GCDrainStackTargetSize);

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2023

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315242: G1: Fix -Wconversion warnings around GCDrainStackTargetSize

Reviewed-by: tschatzl, mli

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c90cd2c: 8286789: Test forceEarlyReturn002.java timed out
  • 89d18ea: 8312018: Improve reservation of class space and CDS
  • dd64a4a: 8315241: (fs) Move toRealPath tests in java/nio/file/Path/Misc.java to separate JUnit 5 test
  • 8e4cda0: 8314834: serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags
  • 1ea6463: 8314835: gtest wrappers should be marked as flagless
  • 93e82c0: 8314824: Fix serviceability/jvmti/8036666/GetObjectLockCount.java to use vm flags
  • 7daae1f: 8314263: Signed jars triggering Logger finder recursion and StackOverflowError
  • 6701eba: 8315117: Update Zlib Data Compression Library to Version 1.3
  • e29f0c2: 8297777: Convert jdk.jlink StringSharingPlugin to use Class File API
  • bf63945: 8298992: runtime/NMT/SummarySanityCheck.java failed with "Total committed (MMMMMM) did not match the summarized committed (NNNNNN)"
  • ... and 8 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e22762c010e5cd4c313e5f2816b67d75862935a7...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 30, 2023
Copy link

@Hamlin-Li Hamlin-Li left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

Going to push as commit b0353ad.
Since your change was applied there have been 26 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit b0353ad.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the g1-uint branch August 31, 2023 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants