8315406: [REDO] serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags

[lmesnik]

Test failed because of unexpected output of version string.
The standard convention for tests is to skip any unexpected output (version string, VM warning, vm logging) and only fail on expected error patterns.
Fix is tested by running with default options and with '-showversion' vm option.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8315406: [REDO] serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags (Bug - P2)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15499/head:pull/15499
$ git checkout pull/15499

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15499
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15499/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15499

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15499

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15499.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@lmesnik The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 03: Full - Incremental (797c9f28)
• 02: Full - Incremental (45622404)
• 01: Full - Incremental (c1650fc5)
• 00: Full (c196e3c6)

[openjdk]

@lmesnik This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

[dholmes-ora]

handler seems unused now as well. There was obviously some kind of grander design for this API that we now seem to be cutting off.

[lmesnik]

Submitted #15502

[dcubed-ojdk]

@lmesnik - I have changed the synopsis of this bug since the original fix
was [BACKOUT]'ed. This bug and PR is now a [REDO]. Use "/issue JDK-8315406"
to easily update the name.

[dcubed-ojdk]

Although the original failure mode only happened in Tier3, because of the
broadness of the changes, this PR needs to be run thru more Mach5 Tiers
before being integrated.

[dcubed-ojdk]

Is there a description in the PR or bug that describes the latest
version of this fix. I've read thru the latest changes, but I'm having
trouble putting together a picture.