Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8315445: 8314748 causes crashes in x64 builds #15512

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

theRealAph
Copy link
Contributor

@theRealAph theRealAph commented Aug 31, 2023

The crash happens during this phase:
[2023-08-31T08:51:27,258Z] Optimizing the exploded image

This is the failure mode:

# Internal Error (src/hotspot/cpu/x86/macroAssembler_x86.cpp:2755), pid=20045, tid=20157
# assert(rscratch != noreg || always_reachable(src)) failed: missing
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (22.0+14) (fastdebug build 22-ea+14-963)
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug 22-ea+14-963, mixed mode, tiered, compressed oops, compressed class ptrs, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# V [libjvm.so+0x12f17b9] MacroAssembler::evmovdquq(XMMRegister, AddressLiteral, int, Register)+0x1a9

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8315445: 8314748 causes crashes in x64 builds (Bug - P1)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15512/head:pull/15512
$ git checkout pull/15512

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15512
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15512/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15512

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15512

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15512.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 31, 2023

👋 Welcome back aph! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

@theRealAph The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 31, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 31, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've totally missed that it in the review - thanks for fixing it quickly! Looks good and trivial.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

@theRealAph This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315445: 8314748 causes crashes in x64 builds

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 145d8bc: 8315051: jdk/jfr/jvm/TestGetEventWriter.java fails with non-JVMCI GCs

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 31, 2023
@theRealAph
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've totally missed that it in the review - thanks for fixing it quickly! Looks good and trivial.

It was very hard to spot. Default arguments [sometimes] considered harmful.

8314748 is only going to fail with certain memory layouts, and I can't reproduce that. Should I wait for all the auto-tests to complete, or just push, on the grounds that it's not going to make things any worse?

@chhagedorn
Copy link
Member

chhagedorn commented Aug 31, 2023

It was very hard to spot. Default arguments [sometimes] considered harmful.

Indeed!

I've run a quick sanity tier1 testing which just finished and looked good. So, I guess this is good to go as the original testing before the additional clean-up looked good.

@theRealAph
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

Going to push as commit 29ff1e4.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 145d8bc: 8315051: jdk/jfr/jvm/TestGetEventWriter.java fails with non-JVMCI GCs

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

@theRealAph Pushed as commit 29ff1e4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants