-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8315534: Incorrect warnings about implicit annotation processing #15540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back jlahoda! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
Thanks for fixing this @lahodaj ; looks fine. I think this issue would be good to backport to 21u as well. |
|
@lahodaj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 42 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/integrate |
|
/backport jdk21u |
|
Going to push as commit 94a74a0.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@lahodaj the backport was successfully created on the branch lahodaj-backport-94a74a0a in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk21u. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk21u:master, just click the following link: The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:
If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk21u: |
When the API client sets annotation processors using
CompilationTask.setProcessorsand then usesJavacTaskto drive the compiler using theanalyze()method, thecompiler.note.implicit.annotation.processingnote is printed even though the annotation processing is explicit.This patch is attempting to solve that by marking all processing with explicit processors as explicit.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15540/head:pull/15540$ git checkout pull/15540Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15540$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15540/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15540View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15540Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15540.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment