Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8315486: vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/ThreadReference/ForceEarlyReturn/forceEarlyReturn002/forceEarlyReturn002.java timed out #15601

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

alexmenkov
Copy link

@alexmenkov alexmenkov commented Sep 6, 2023

To test ForceEarlyReturn command for NO_MORE_FRAMES case the test creates ThreadStartEventRequest with SUSPEND_ALL policy and requests debuggee to start new thread.
If debuggee JVM starts some internal threads before the request is cleared (i.e. we have several ThreadStart events), 2nd event suspends debuggee again and the test fails with timeout.
The change adds THREAD_ONLY modifier to the ThreadStartEventRequest to generate event only for desired thread.
It requires thread ID, so debuggee was updated to create Thread object in advance, debugger reads the thread ID from static field (it does not need to be static, but Debugee class has convenient methods to retrieve class ID and static field value).

Testing: 100 runs of the test on windows-x64-debug,linux-x64-debug,macosx-x64-debug with JTREG_TEST_THREAD_FACTORY=Virtual, with and without "-XX:+UseZGC -XX:+ZGenerational"


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8315486: vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/ThreadReference/ForceEarlyReturn/forceEarlyReturn002/forceEarlyReturn002.java timed out (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15601/head:pull/15601
$ git checkout pull/15601

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15601
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15601/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15601

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15601

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15601.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back amenkov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 6, 2023

@alexmenkov The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 6, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good. Just one minor comment suggestion.

// create command packet and fill requred out data
CommandPacket command = new CommandPacket(JDWP.Command.EventRequest.Set);
command.addByte(JDWP.EventKind.THREAD_START);
command.addByte(JDWP.SuspendPolicy.ALL);
command.addInt(0);
// THREAD_ONLY modifier
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add a bit more of a comment here that explains we only want the THREAD_START event for the specified test thread and not any others that might start up.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 7, 2023

@alexmenkov This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315486: vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/ThreadReference/ForceEarlyReturn/forceEarlyReturn002/forceEarlyReturn002.java timed out

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, lmesnik

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 246 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e0f8d16: 8314829: serviceability/sa/jmap-hprof/JMapHProfLargeHeapTest.java ignores vm flags
  • 7b1e2bf: 8315415: OutputAnalyzer.shouldMatchByLine() fails in some cases
  • da57d2a: 8308592: Framework for CA interoperability testing
  • a6d120d: 8316513: Serial: Remove unused invalidate_remembered_set
  • 607bd4e: 8316294: AIX: Build fopen system call fails on file _BUILD_LIBJDWP_objectfilenames.txt
  • f25c920: 8314774: Optimize URLEncoder
  • 7c5f2a2: 8315669: Open source several Swing PopupMenu related tests
  • cf74b8c: 8316337: (bf) Concurrency issue in DirectByteBuffer.Deallocator
  • 4461eeb: 8312498: Thread::getState and JVM TI GetThreadState should return TIMED_WAITING virtual thread is timed parked
  • 670b456: 8315038: Capstone disassembler stops when it sees a bad instruction
  • ... and 236 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b38bcae1bad399d0a3ffc091835bf89140550bc2...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 7, 2023
@alexmenkov
Copy link
Author

Ping. need 1 more review.

@alexmenkov
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2023

Going to push as commit 041510d.
Since your change was applied there have been 300 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ef49e6c: 8316629: j.text.DateFormatSymbols setZoneStrings() exception is unhelpful
  • 496264c: 8316435: sun.util.calendar.CalendarSystem subclassing should be restricted
  • 1100dbc: 8316695: ProblemList serviceability/jvmti/RedefineClasses/RedefineLeakThrowable.java
  • d3e8218: 8316306: Open source and convert manual Swing test
  • 4e57177: 8316383: NullPointerException in AbstractSAXParser after JDK-8306632
  • 3b397c8: 8315965: Open source various AWT applet tests
  • c698b45: 8313229: DHEKeySizing.java should be modified to use TLS versions TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2
  • 015f6f5: 8315771: [JVMCI] Resolution of bootstrap methods with int[] static arguments
  • 83b01cf: 8311922: [macOS] right-Option key fails to generate release event
  • 542b300: 8315954: getArgumentValues002.java fails on Graal
  • ... and 290 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b38bcae1bad399d0a3ffc091835bf89140550bc2...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2023

@alexmenkov Pushed as commit 041510d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@alexmenkov alexmenkov deleted the forceER02 branch September 21, 2023 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants