Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8257594: C2 compiled checkcast of non-null object triggers endless deoptimization/recompilation cycle #1566

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann commented Dec 2, 2020

When C2 determines at compile time that there is no subtype relation between the objects involved in a checkcast, it inserts a null assert because the checkcast can only pass if the value is null. This will trigger deoptimization and recompilation if the object is non-null. However, we can do better here if we already know that the object is non-null (i.e. the check always fails) or if we hit too_many_traps_or_recompiles (which suggests that the object is often null) to avoid an endless deoptimization/recompilation cycle until we hit the PerMethodRecompilationCutoff and starve at lower tiers.

In the former case we can simply throw right away and in the latter case we should fall back to a full check in case there is an exception handler in compiled code that handles the failing (non-null) case. That way we avoid deoptimization.

I've spotted this with our test framework for inline types in project Valhalla, while investigating an intermittent failure where several test methods suddenly became non-compilable at tier 4.

Thanks,
Tobias


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8257594: C2 compiled checkcast of non-null object triggers endless deoptimization/recompilation cycle

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1566/head:pull/1566
$ git checkout pull/1566

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 2, 2020

👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 2, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2020

@TobiHartmann The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 2, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 2, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 3, 2020

@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8257594: C2 compiled checkcast of non-null object triggers endless deoptimization/recompilation cycle

Reviewed-by: roland, vlivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 3, 2020
Copy link

@iwanowww iwanowww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the reviews @rwestrel and @iwanowww !

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 3, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 3, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 3, 2020

@TobiHartmann Since your change was applied there have been 21 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 129c377.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants