-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8315954: getArgumentValues002.java fails on Graal #15705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23b94e3
added ResolvedJavaMethod.getLiveObjectLocalsAt
dougxc b35ba22
simplified getLiveObjectLocalsAt and moved it from ResolvedJavaMethod…
dougxc 0f01fe3
need to zero oop_map_buf
dougxc c6c6c0d
generalized getLiveObjectLocalsAt to getOopMapAt
dougxc 3c903ec
add assertion to InterpreterOopMap::resource_copy
dougxc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we sanity check against
mask.number_of_entries()? One wrinkle here is thatcompute_one_oop_mapalso computes information about the stack so the mask it computes can be larger than just max_locals. For the purposes of OSR this doesn't matter as none of the JITs support OSR with a non-empty stack, so we would never call it for a bci with a non-empty stack. So should we disallow calling it with a non-empty stack or just properly handle it by passing in an array long enough to containmax_locals + max_stack?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We only look up the mask for locals and so ignore stack indexes in the mask altogether. I'm assuming therefore that
mask.is_oop(i)can never hit any problems.Note that this API should be safe when called for any valid BCI, not just those for an OSR entry point. Even if called for a BCI with a non-empty stack, the current implementation simply ignores that part of the mask.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that's implied by the name of the method. It would make me happy if there was a comment pointing out that we're explicitly ignoring whether the stack is non-empty and contains oops.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead, I generalized
getLiveObjectLocalsAttogetOopMapAtsince the VM computation is for both locals and operand stack anyway.When called for OSR entry points, the result will be the same since (currently) HotSpot requires the stack to be empty.