Skip to content

8316181: Move the fast locking implementation out of the .ad files #15712

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

stefank
Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank commented Sep 13, 2023

Some platforms put the fast locking implementation in the C2_MacroAssembler class, while others have it in the .ad files. I'd like to propose that we unify this a bit and move the code out of the .ad files.

The benefit is consistency between the platforms but also that it is easier to work with the C++ code when it is in plain C++ files and not in the .ad files.

The implementation is a pure copy of the code except that the section:

    C2_MacroAssembler _masm(&cbuf);
    Register oop = as_Register($object$$reg);
    Register box = as_Register($box$$reg);
    Register disp_hdr = as_Register($tmp$$reg);
    Register tmp = as_Register($tmp2$$reg);

has been replaced with:

  Register oop = objectReg;
  Register box = boxReg;
  Register disp_hdr = tmpReg;
  Register tmp = tmp2Reg;

and the references to __ have been removed.

This change affects AArch64 and RISC-V

Tested with tier1-3 on AArch64

This PR depends on #15709


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8316181: Move the fast locking implementation out of the .ad files (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15712/head:pull/15712
$ git checkout pull/15712

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15712
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15712/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15712

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15712

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15712.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 13, 2023

👋 Welcome back stefank! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/15709 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 13, 2023

@stefank The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 13, 2023
@stefank stefank force-pushed the fast_locking_unification branch from e527216 to 0efabfe Compare September 13, 2023 11:36
@stefank stefank marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2023 11:38
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 13, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Webrevs

@stefank stefank changed the title 8316181: Move the fast locking implementaiton out of the .ad files 8316181: Move the fast locking implementation out of the .ad files Sep 13, 2023
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk-notifier openjdk-notifier bot changed the base branch from pr/15709 to master September 14, 2023 07:08
@openjdk-notifier
Copy link

The parent pull request that this pull request depends on has now been integrated and the target branch of this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout fast_locking_unification
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 14, 2023

@stefank This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8316181: Move the fast locking implementation out of the .ad files

Reviewed-by: thartmann, rkennke, fyang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 14408bc: 8315973: Remove unused fields from ThreadLocalRandom

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@rkennke rkennke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you!

Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I have tested both #15709 and this one on linux-riscv64 platform. Result is clean.

@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Sep 14, 2023

Thanks @rkennke and @RealFYang for the reviews!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 14, 2023

Going to push as commit b48dbf6.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8f4dfc4: 8316164: Opensource JMenuBar manual test
  • 33c62e4: 8316154: Opensource JTextArea manual tests
  • 14408bc: 8315973: Remove unused fields from ThreadLocalRandom

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 14, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 14, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 14, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 14, 2023

@stefank Pushed as commit b48dbf6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants