Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8316319: Generational ZGC: The SoftMaxHeapSize might be wrong when CDS decreases the MaxHeapSize #15841

Closed

Conversation

stefank
Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank commented Sep 20, 2023

Generational ZGC sets SoftMaxHeapSize to 90% of the MaxHeapSize if the user has not specified the maximum heap size with any of the available flags. Unfortunately, this break when CDS later on decreases the MaxHeapSize.

I propose that we solve this by moving the code that sets the SoftMaxHeapSize to the point after CDS and the GC has done its final tweaks to the MaxHeapSize.

This can be easily reproduced just by running:
java -XX:+UseZGC -XX:+ZGenerational -Xshare:dump -Xlog:gc+init -version

This wasn't caught in testing because our test infrastructure uses MaxRamPercentage to set the maximum heap size. I've manually verified that the patch fixes the issue and that SoftMaxHeapSize is set as expected.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8316319: Generational ZGC: The SoftMaxHeapSize might be wrong when CDS decreases the MaxHeapSize (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15841/head:pull/15841
$ git checkout pull/15841

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15841
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15841/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15841

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15841

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15841.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 20, 2023

👋 Welcome back stefank! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 20, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 20, 2023

@stefank The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 20, 2023
@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Sep 20, 2023

@mrserb - thanks for reporting this bug! Do you want to test this patch in your test infra?

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 20, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 20, 2023

@stefank This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8316319: Generational ZGC: The SoftMaxHeapSize might be wrong when CDS decreases the MaxHeapSize

Reviewed-by: aboldtch, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 36 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 20, 2023
@mrserb
Copy link
Member

mrserb commented Sep 20, 2023

Looking into the patch.

@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Sep 22, 2023

Thanks for reviewing!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2023

Going to push as commit fe86263.
Since your change was applied there have been 47 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 775e22a: 8316699: TestDynamicConstant.java fails with release VMs
  • a1e0346: 8316698: build failure caused by JDK-8316456
  • c72f004: 8316456: StackWalker may skip Continuation::yield0 frame mistakenly
  • 041510d: 8315486: vmTestbase/nsk/jdwp/ThreadReference/ForceEarlyReturn/forceEarlyReturn002/forceEarlyReturn002.java timed out
  • ef49e6c: 8316629: j.text.DateFormatSymbols setZoneStrings() exception is unhelpful
  • 496264c: 8316435: sun.util.calendar.CalendarSystem subclassing should be restricted
  • 1100dbc: 8316695: ProblemList serviceability/jvmti/RedefineClasses/RedefineLeakThrowable.java
  • d3e8218: 8316306: Open source and convert manual Swing test
  • 4e57177: 8316383: NullPointerException in AbstractSAXParser after JDK-8306632
  • 3b397c8: 8315965: Open source various AWT applet tests
  • ... and 37 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e1870d360e05c372e672b519d7de2a60c333675b...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 22, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 22, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 22, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2023

@stefank Pushed as commit fe86263.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants