Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8316661: CompilerThread leaks CodeBlob memory when dynamically stopping compiler thread in non-product #15858

Closed

Conversation

tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl commented Sep 21, 2023

Hi all,

please review this change to fix a memory leak I found when having CodeCache::free call the destructor of CodeBlob: when adding the latter, one gets assertion failures that the native memory that _asm_remarks and _dbg_strings members were not deallocated properly when

  • stopping a compiler thread due to dynamic compiler thread policy
  • shutting down the compiler runtime

Testing: gha

Thanks,
Thomas


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8316661: CompilerThread leaks CodeBlob memory when dynamically stopping compiler thread in non-product (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15858/head:pull/15858
$ git checkout pull/15858

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15858
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15858/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15858

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15858

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15858.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 21, 2023

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8316661 8316661: CodeBlob leaks memory when dynamically stopping compiler thread in non-product Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2023

@tschatzl The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 21, 2023
@tschatzl tschatzl changed the title 8316661: CodeBlob leaks memory when dynamically stopping compiler thread in non-product 8316661: CompilerThread leaks CodeBlob memory when dynamically stopping compiler thread in non-product Sep 21, 2023
@tschatzl tschatzl marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2023 15:55
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 21, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 21, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree. This is good cleanup.

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 25, 2023

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8316661: CompilerThread leaks CodeBlob memory when dynamically stopping compiler thread in non-product

Reviewed-by: kvn, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 110 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1be3557: 8315721: CloseRace.java#id0 fails transiently on libgraal
  • 347bd15: 8315966: Relativize initial_sp in interpreter frames
  • b24ad7c: 8316924: java/lang/Thread/virtual/stress/ParkALot.java times out
  • ad6df41: 8316710: Exclude java/awt/font/Rotate/RotatedTextTest.java
  • 45a145e: 8299915: Remove ArrayAllocatorMallocLimit and associated code
  • 50a7a04: 8316417: ObjectMonitorIterator does not return the most recent monitor and is incorrect if no monitors exists
  • fee9d33: 8293176: SSLEngine handshaker does not send an alert after a bad parameters
  • fd52be2: 8316895: SeenThread::print_action_queue called on a null pointer
  • e39197e: 8316933: RISC-V: compiler/vectorapi/VectorCastShape128Test.java fails when using RVV
  • b659e03: 8316897: tools/jpackage/junit tests fail on AIX after JDK-8316547
  • ... and 100 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ec74194cb75afcaab2f77e8728391bb9104ccc73...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 25, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good.

@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @vnkozlov @TobiHartmann for your reviews
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2023

Going to push as commit edcc559.
Since your change was applied there have been 110 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1be3557: 8315721: CloseRace.java#id0 fails transiently on libgraal
  • 347bd15: 8315966: Relativize initial_sp in interpreter frames
  • b24ad7c: 8316924: java/lang/Thread/virtual/stress/ParkALot.java times out
  • ad6df41: 8316710: Exclude java/awt/font/Rotate/RotatedTextTest.java
  • 45a145e: 8299915: Remove ArrayAllocatorMallocLimit and associated code
  • 50a7a04: 8316417: ObjectMonitorIterator does not return the most recent monitor and is incorrect if no monitors exists
  • fee9d33: 8293176: SSLEngine handshaker does not send an alert after a bad parameters
  • fd52be2: 8316895: SeenThread::print_action_queue called on a null pointer
  • e39197e: 8316933: RISC-V: compiler/vectorapi/VectorCastShape128Test.java fails when using RVV
  • b659e03: 8316897: tools/jpackage/junit tests fail on AIX after JDK-8316547
  • ... and 100 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ec74194cb75afcaab2f77e8728391bb9104ccc73...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 27, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 27, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 27, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2023

@tschatzl Pushed as commit edcc559.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@tschatzl tschatzl deleted the submit/8316661-memory-leak-codeblob branch September 27, 2023 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants