Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8310727: C2: *_of() methods in PhaseIterGVN should use uint for the node index #15946

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dlunde
Copy link
Member

@dlunde dlunde commented Sep 27, 2023

This changeset addresses the below.

Some *_of() methods in PhaseIterGVN like replace_input_of() use int instead of uint for the node index. We should change that.

Testing (on all Oracle-supported platforms)

  • tier1
  • HotSpot parts of tier2 and tier3

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8310727: C2: *_of() methods in PhaseIterGVN should use uint for the node index (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15946/head:pull/15946
$ git checkout pull/15946

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15946
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15946/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15946

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15946

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15946.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Sep 27, 2023
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 27, 2023

Hi @dlunde, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user dlunde" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8310727 8310727: C2: *_of() methods in PhaseIterGVN should use uint for the node index Sep 27, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2023

@dlunde The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 27, 2023
@dlunde
Copy link
Member Author

dlunde commented Sep 27, 2023

/covered

@dlunde
Copy link
Member Author

dlunde commented Sep 27, 2023

Reason for covered: I'm an Oracle employee

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Sep 27, 2023
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 27, 2023

Thank you! Please allow for a few business days to verify that your employer has signed the OCA. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot removed oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status labels Oct 7, 2023
@dlunde dlunde marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2023 09:39
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 9, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good (and trivial) to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2023

@dlunde This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8310727: C2: *_of() methods in PhaseIterGVN should use uint for the node index

Reviewed-by: thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • a57ae7e: 8317594: G1: Refactor find_empty_from_idx_reverse

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TobiHartmann) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 9, 2023
@dlunde
Copy link
Member Author

dlunde commented Oct 9, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Oct 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2023

@dlunde
Your change (at version 5cde402) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Going to push as commit 7ff1938.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • a57ae7e: 8317594: G1: Refactor find_empty_from_idx_reverse

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Oct 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2023

@TobiHartmann @dlunde Pushed as commit 7ff1938.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dlunde dlunde deleted the 8310727-uint branch October 10, 2023 07:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants