Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8253762: JFR: getField(String) should be able to access subfields #1606

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

egahlin
Copy link
Member

@egahlin egahlin commented Dec 3, 2020

Allow EventType::getFiled(String) to access subfields, similar to getValue(String) for values.

Testing: jdk/jdk/jfr


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8253762: JFR: getField(String) should be able to access subfields

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1606/head:pull/1606
$ git checkout pull/1606

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 3, 2020

👋 Welcome back egahlin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 3, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 3, 2020

@egahlin The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-jfr

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-jfr hotspot-jfr-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 3, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 3, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link

@mgronlun mgronlun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2020

@egahlin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8253762: JFR: getField(String) should be able to access subfields

Reviewed-by: mgronlun

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 42 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • fcc8479: 8257724: Incorrect package of the linked class in BaseSSLSocketImpl
  • d8ac76f: 8257651: LambdaEagerInit.java test failed in 2 different ways
  • 3eb6946: 8257732: Problem list TestJFRWithJMX for OL 8.2 until the issue is resolved
  • ac54900: 8257401: Use switch expressions in jdk.internal.net.http and java.net.http
  • 86b6575: 8257574: C2: "failed: parsing found no loops but there are some" assert failure
  • dede01e: 8257622: MemoryAccess methods are missing @forceinline annotations
  • 1d2d981: 8257423: [PPC64] Support -XX:-UseInlineCaches
  • feabdde: 8251843: jfr/tool/TestPrintJSON.java fails intermittently
  • c6f93ec: 8257707: Fix incorrect format string in Http1HeaderParser
  • fbdc187: 8257624: C2: PhaseMacroExpand::eliminate_macro_nodes() crashes on out-of-bounds access into macro node array
  • ... and 32 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/4a267f1bc2b025aae2cb9df7283156aeb0282406...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 4, 2020
@egahlin
Copy link
Member Author

egahlin commented Dec 8, 2020

/csr

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2020

@egahlin the issue for this pull request, JDK-8253762, already has an approved CSR request: JDK-8257818

@egahlin
Copy link
Member Author

egahlin commented Dec 8, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 8, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 8, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2020

@egahlin Since your change was applied there have been 82 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 39b8a2e: 8257670: sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/SSLSocketLeak.java reports leaks
  • c43c224: 8257796: [TESTBUG] TestUseSHA512IntrinsicsOptionOnSupportedCPU.java fails on x86_32
  • 62c7788: 8257211: C2: Enable call devirtualization during post-parse phase
  • 149a02f: 8257572: Deprecate the archaic signal-chaining interfaces: sigset and signal
  • f92745d: 8257718: LogCompilation: late_inline doesnt work right for JDK 8 logs
  • 6937d9f: 8257799: Update JLS cross-references in java.compiler
  • a5297bd: 8254939: macOS: unused function 'replicate4_imm'
  • 36c0600: 8257805: Add compiler/blackhole tests to tier1
  • 395b6bd: 8257817: Shenandoah: Don't race with conc-weak-in-progress flag in weak-LRB
  • a265c20: 8255619: Localized WinResources.properties have MsiInstallerStrings_en.wxl resource
  • ... and 72 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/4a267f1bc2b025aae2cb9df7283156aeb0282406...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit cef606f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-jfr hotspot-jfr-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants