Skip to content

JDK-8317693: Unused parameter to Tokens.Token.comment method#16088

Closed
jonathan-gibbons wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jonathan-gibbons:8317693.tokens-token-comment
Closed

JDK-8317693: Unused parameter to Tokens.Token.comment method#16088
jonathan-gibbons wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jonathan-gibbons:8317693.tokens-token-comment

Conversation

@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons commented Oct 6, 2023

Please review a simple cleanup to eliminate an unused parameter and rename the enclosing method.

No new tests; bug is primarily noreg-cleanup. Two tests were affected by the change, but are not in themselves tests for the change.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8317693: Unused parameter to Tokens.Token.comment method (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16088/head:pull/16088
$ git checkout pull/16088

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16088
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16088/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16088

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16088

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16088.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 6, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler
  • javadoc
  • kulla

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org kulla kulla-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 6, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@irisclark irisclark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice clean-up.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 7, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8317693: Unused parameter to Tokens.Token.comment method

Reviewed-by: iris, jlahoda

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bcc986b: 8317601: Windows build on WSL broken after JDK-8317340
  • 460ebcd: 8314978: Multiple server call from connection failing with expect100 in getOutputStream

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 7, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@lahodaj lahodaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me.

@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Going to push as commit 3ff5a78.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 508fa71: 8317736: Stream::handleReset locks twice
  • 1f06325: 8317471: ListFormat::parseObject() spec can be improved on parsePosition valid values
  • a07a4a3: 8317422: [JVMCI] concurrency issue in MethodData creation
  • 7ff1938: 8310727: C2: *_of() methods in PhaseIterGVN should use uint for the node index
  • a57ae7e: 8317594: G1: Refactor find_empty_from_idx_reverse
  • 6ddbfaa: 8317136: [AIX] Problem List runtime/jni/terminatedThread/TestTerminatedThread.java
  • 0cf1a55: 8317440: Lock rank checking fails when code root set is modified with the Servicelock held after JDK-8315503
  • bcc986b: 8317601: Windows build on WSL broken after JDK-8317340
  • 460ebcd: 8314978: Multiple server call from connection failing with expect100 in getOutputStream

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons Pushed as commit 3ff5a78.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons deleted the 8317693.tokens-token-comment branch October 9, 2023 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org kulla kulla-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants