Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 commented Oct 18, 2023

Trivial cleanup that removes duplicated checkings.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8318383: Remove duplicated checks in os::get_native_stack() in posix implementation (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16232/head:pull/16232
$ git checkout pull/16232

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16232
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16232/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16232

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16232

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16232.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 18, 2023

👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 18, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2023

@zhengyu123 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 18, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 18, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Took me a few minutes to convince myself but looks good. :)

Thanks

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2023

@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8318383: Remove duplicated checks in os::get_native_stack() in posix implementation

Reviewed-by: dholmes, stuefe

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 168 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 24bc5bd: 8318104: macOS 10.13 check in TabButtonAccessibility.m can be removed
  • e25a49a: 8318471: ProblemList compiler/sharedstubs/SharedTrampolineTest.java
  • ce8ebeb: 8317979: Use TZ database style abbreviations in the CLDR locale provider
  • ab13568: 8318029: Minor improvement to logging output in container at-requires
  • 278de7a: 8318458: Update javac and java manpages with restricted method options
  • 6fc3514: 8318363: Foreign benchmarks fail to build on some platforms
  • 31ef400: 8318183: C2: VM may crash after hitting node limit
  • 4e77b3c: 8315974: Make fields final in 'com.sun.crypto.provider' package
  • 8dd8096: 8317886: Add @sealedGraph to ByteBuffer
  • 9843c97: 8318365: Test runtime/cds/appcds/sharedStrings/InternSharedString.java fails after JDK-8311538
  • ... and 158 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/a8eacb31ab8466f50a939d6748dbdd1560516878...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 18, 2023
@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member

Please fix the typo in JBS and PR title: implemenation -> implementation

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 changed the title 8318383: Remove duplicated checks in os::get_native_stack() in posix implemenation 8318383: Remove duplicated checks in os::get_native_stack() in posix implementation Oct 18, 2023
@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please fix the typo in JBS and PR title: implemenation -> implementation

Fixed.

Thanks, @dholmes-ora

Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Zhengyu,

This is not trivial :)

let
A=> fp == null
B=> cb != null
C=> sender-pc == null
D=> is_first_frame

Old:
if (A || B || C || D) break;
if (!C && !D) get_sender_for...;

New:
if (A || B || C || D) break;
get_sender...

Not sure if that is correct, but it is at least not equivalent, so not a simple cleanup.

(note that I support any cleanup, the old code is terrible).

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhengyu123 commented Oct 18, 2023

Hi Zhengyu,

This is not trivial :)

let A=> fp == null B=> cb != null C=> sender-pc == null D=> is_first_frame

Old: if (A || B || C || D) break; if (!C && !D) get_sender_for...;

New: if (A || B || C || D) break; get_sender...

Not sure if that is correct, but it is at least not equivalent, so not a simple cleanup.

(note that I support any cleanup, the old code is terrible).

I agree it is confusing, I stared at it for quite a long while. I think I copied it from somewhere.

In the old code, when it arrives to the second check, it must have:

fr.send_pc() != nullptr and os::is_first_C_frame(&fr) == false

so if (fr.sender_pc() && !os::is_first_C_frame(&fr)) check is always true, no?

For if (A || B || C || D) break; not to break out, it must have C == false and D == false, then !C && !D should always be true.

@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member

@tstuefe It took me a while to get it too. If we don't break then the two conditions we were checking must be true - else we would not reach that check.

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member

tstuefe commented Oct 19, 2023

@zhengyu123 @dholmes-ora Okay, I think you are right.

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @dholmes-ora @tstuefe

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Going to push as commit 9cf334f.
Since your change was applied there have been 175 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • defc7e0: 8318454: TestLayoutPaths broken on Big Endian platforms after JDK-8317837
  • 3c70f2c: 8318418: hsdis build fails with system binutils on Ubuntu
  • 15acf4b: 8318324: Drop redundant default methods from FFM API
  • 1a09835: 8317358: G1: Make TestMaxNewSize use createTestJvm
  • 47bb1a1: 8318415: Adjust describing comment of os_getChildren after 8315026
  • 80bd22d: 8316144: Remove unused field jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.XMLStreamWriterImpl.Element._Depth
  • c0e154c: 8318089: Class space not marked as such with NMT when CDS is off
  • 24bc5bd: 8318104: macOS 10.13 check in TabButtonAccessibility.m can be removed
  • e25a49a: 8318471: ProblemList compiler/sharedstubs/SharedTrampolineTest.java
  • ce8ebeb: 8317979: Use TZ database style abbreviations in the CLDR locale provider
  • ... and 165 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/a8eacb31ab8466f50a939d6748dbdd1560516878...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 19, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2023

@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit 9cf334f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 deleted the JDK-8318383 branch October 27, 2023 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants