Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8318422: Allow poller threads be virtual threads #16243

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman commented Oct 18, 2023

Virtual threads doing blocking I/O rely on poller threads to unpark virtual threads when sockets are ready for I/O. Right now, the poller threads are dedicated platform threads that block waiting for I/O events. In some environments it would be better to have the poller thread be virtual threads so that handling of I/O events integrates better with the virtual thread scheduler and doesn't steal cycles from the carrier threads.

The changes to support this are straight forward but it has required refactoring the internal Poller class so the changes might look more than they actually are. The changes mean the Poller implementation supports two modes. The default is changed on Linux to use the "virtual thread poller" mode. The default on other platforms is to use platform threads as before. As part of the refactor, the so-called "indirect" mode with updater threads is removed. This mode came from experimenting in the loom repo a long time ago and probably should have been removed before integration.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8318422: Allow poller threads be virtual threads (Enhancement - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16243/head:pull/16243
$ git checkout pull/16243

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16243
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16243/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16243

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16243

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16243.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 18, 2023

👋 Welcome back alanb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2023

@AlanBateman The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net
  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added nio nio-dev@openjdk.org net net-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 18, 2023
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label remove net

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the net net-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 18, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2023

@AlanBateman
The net label was successfully removed.

@AlanBateman AlanBateman marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2023 14:58
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 2, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Webrevs

* Returns true if this poller is for read (POLLIN) events.
* Returns the poller's file descriptor, used when the read and write poller threads
* are virtual threads.
*
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be useful to add some more explanation here like: "When there is no activity on any of a subpoller's descriptors, the descriptor of the subpoller is registered with the master poller" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlanBateman AlanBateman Nov 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be useful to add some more explanation here like: "When there is no activity on any of a subpoller's descriptors, the descriptor of the subpoller is registered with the master poller" ?

The big comment on Mode.VTHREAD_POLLERS explains this. It also links to the Karsten/Barghi paper where a similar scheme is presented. Do you think that's enough?

Copy link
Member

@Michael-Mc-Mahon Michael-Mc-Mahon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2023

@AlanBateman This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8318422: Allow poller threads be virtual threads

Reviewed-by: michaelm

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 008ca2a: 8317620: Build JDK tools with ModuleMainClass attribute
  • 1a21c1a: 8318736: com/sun/jdi/JdwpOnThrowTest.java failed with "transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use"
  • 81db172: 8318955: Add ReleaseIntArrayElements in Java_sun_awt_X11_XlibWrapper_SetBitmapShape XlbWrapper.c to early return

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 3, 2023
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good to me.

Thanks. I've had to one additional update to ProblemList-Virtual.txt to excludevmTestbase/nsk/jdi/VMOutOfMemoryException/VMOutOfMemoryException001/VMOutOfMemoryException001.java on all platforms. It had been excluded on Windows only but it's quite fragile and we tickle it to fail on Linux with these changes. I had a brief exchange with @plummercj in JDK-8285417 about this a few days ago. It's excluded on all platforms in the loom repo already so I should have remembered to include it in this update.

Copy link
Member

@Michael-Mc-Mahon Michael-Mc-Mahon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Latest change is good.

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2023

Going to push as commit c099cf5.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 29cf2c4: 8319053: Segment dump files remain after parallel heap dump on Windows
  • ea6a88a: 8318466: Improve spec of NumberFormat's methods with unsupported operations
  • de6667c: 8225377: type annotations are not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries
  • 008ca2a: 8317620: Build JDK tools with ModuleMainClass attribute
  • 1a21c1a: 8318736: com/sun/jdi/JdwpOnThrowTest.java failed with "transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use"
  • 81db172: 8318955: Add ReleaseIntArrayElements in Java_sun_awt_X11_XlibWrapper_SetBitmapShape XlbWrapper.c to early return

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2023

@AlanBateman Pushed as commit c099cf5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants