Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8318669: Target OS detection in 'test-prebuilt' makefile target is incorrect when running on MSYS2 #16343

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

fthevenet
Copy link
Member

@fthevenet fthevenet commented Oct 24, 2023

This PR addresses OS detection not working properly when running test-prebuilt on MSYS2, which causes some Windows specific tests to misbehave or fail in Github Actions.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8318669: Target OS detection in 'test-prebuilt' makefile target is incorrect when running on MSYS2 (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16343/head:pull/16343
$ git checkout pull/16343

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16343
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16343/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16343

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16343

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16343.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 24, 2023

👋 Welcome back fthevenet! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 24, 2023

@fthevenet The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 24, 2023
@fthevenet fthevenet marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2023 18:18
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 24, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 24, 2023

Webrevs

OPENJDK_TARGET_OS := linux
else ifeq ($(UNAME_OS), Darwin)
OPENJDK_TARGET_OS := macosx
ifeq ($(UNAME_OS), MINGW64)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of nesting, this inside the else body, creating more nesting below, make supports

else ifeq ...

By using that you can keep the else body with unix on the same indentation level.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

Copy link
Member

@magicus magicus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good. Thanks for fixing it!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 25, 2023

@fthevenet This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8318669: Target OS detection in 'test-prebuilt' makefile target is incorrect when running on MSYS2

Reviewed-by: ihse, erikj

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 27 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c587211: 8316003: Update FileChooserSymLinkTest.java to HTML instructions
  • 42b9ac8: 8294156: Allow PassFailJFrame.Builder to create test UI
  • 14090ef: 8294158: HTML formatting for PassFailJFrame instructions
  • d2d1592: 8318713: G1: Use more accurate age in predict_eden_copy_time_ms
  • c3cdfe2: 8318692: Add instructions for creating Ubuntu-based sysroot for cross compilation
  • ba7d08b: 8316961: Fallback implementations for 64-bit Atomic::{add,xchg} on 32-bit platforms
  • d7205e6: 8318102: macos10.14 check in CSystemColors can be removed.
  • 5ce718e: 8318100: Remove redundant check for Metal support
  • f1dfdc1: 8311877: [macos] Add CLI options to provide signing identity directly to codesign and productbuild
  • 9c819fd: 8318051: Duration.between uses exceptions for control flow
  • ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/4a16d111b16e556f904fb80075631b8439a9482e...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@magicus, @erikj79) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 25, 2023
@fthevenet
Copy link
Member Author

NB: The test failure in linux-x86 / test (langtools/tier1) is caused by a JVM crash:

# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  Internal Error (g1ConcurrentMark.cpp:1680), pid=23337, tid=23347
#  fatal error: Overflow during reference processing, can not continue. Current mark stack depth: 65472, MarkStackSize: 65536, MarkStackSizeMax: 4194304. Please increase MarkStackSize and/or MarkStackSizeMax and restart.

I believe it is unrelated, as the logs show the correct environment was inferred for this test:

Detected target OS, type and env: [linux] [unix] [linux]

@magicus
Copy link
Member

magicus commented Oct 25, 2023

Yes, it is definitely unrelated. It is in 32-bit code, which is not nearly as well tested. Just ignore it.

@fthevenet
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Oct 25, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 25, 2023

@fthevenet
Your change (at version 43aa74b) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@magicus
Copy link
Member

magicus commented Oct 25, 2023

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 25, 2023

Going to push as commit 202c013.
Since your change was applied there have been 27 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c587211: 8316003: Update FileChooserSymLinkTest.java to HTML instructions
  • 42b9ac8: 8294156: Allow PassFailJFrame.Builder to create test UI
  • 14090ef: 8294158: HTML formatting for PassFailJFrame instructions
  • d2d1592: 8318713: G1: Use more accurate age in predict_eden_copy_time_ms
  • c3cdfe2: 8318692: Add instructions for creating Ubuntu-based sysroot for cross compilation
  • ba7d08b: 8316961: Fallback implementations for 64-bit Atomic::{add,xchg} on 32-bit platforms
  • d7205e6: 8318102: macos10.14 check in CSystemColors can be removed.
  • 5ce718e: 8318100: Remove redundant check for Metal support
  • f1dfdc1: 8311877: [macos] Add CLI options to provide signing identity directly to codesign and productbuild
  • 9c819fd: 8318051: Duration.between uses exceptions for control flow
  • ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/4a16d111b16e556f904fb80075631b8439a9482e...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 25, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 25, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Oct 25, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 25, 2023

@magicus @fthevenet Pushed as commit 202c013.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@fthevenet fthevenet deleted the 8318669 branch October 25, 2023 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build build-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants