JDK-8318957: enhance agentlib:jdwp help output by info about allow option

[MBaesken]

The allow option of agentlib:jdwp has been introduced a long time ago (see JDK-8061228) and is documented here :
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/specs/jpda/conninv.html#oracle-vm-invocation-options
However it is still missing in the agentlib:jdwp help output and should be added there too.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8318957: enhance agentlib:jdwp help output by info about allow option (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Chris Plummer (@plummercj - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16393/head:pull/16393
$ git checkout pull/16393

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16393
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16393/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16393

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16393

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16393.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@MBaesken The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (0b868a03)
• 00: Full (095bc15a)

[plummercj]

I'm just wondering if we should also mention to use "+" to separate addresses in the list.

[MBaesken]

Yes we can add this, I posted another commit adding some information.

[MBaesken]

Hi Chris, are you fine with the latest version ?

[plummercj]

Looks good. Thanks for taking care of this.

[openjdk]

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8318957: enhance agentlib:jdwp help output by info about allow option

Reviewed-by: cjplummer

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 44 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• f1e8787: 8317609: Classfile API fails to verify /jdk.jcmd/sun/tools/jstat/Alignment.class
• 47624f6: 8299058: AssertionError in sun.net.httpserver.ServerImpl when connection is idle
• 2d5829a: 8239508: JFR: @RemoveFields
• 0064cf9: 8311596: Add separate system properties for TLS server and client for maximum chain length
• 3a7525d: 8309118: HttpClient: Add more tests for 100 ExpectContinue with HTTP/2
• f4c5db9: 8318908: Parallel: Remove ExtendedCardValue
• 7452d50: 8318940: [JVMCI] do not set HotSpotNmethod oop for a default HotSpotNmethod
• 3e39d7b: 8319136: Skip pkcs11 tests on linux-aarch64
• ee6f25b: 8319120: Unbound ScopedValue.get() throws the wrong exception
• e05cafd: 8318467: [jmh] tests concurrent.Queues and concurrent.ProducerConsumer hang with 101+ threads
• ... and 34 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/abad0408e8317b43c2cd5bc3d324ff199aa289f5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[MBaesken]

Hi Chris, thanks for the review !

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 53bb7cd.
Since your change was applied there have been 65 commits pushed to the master branch:

• d6ce62e: 8306561: Possible out of bounds access in print_pointer_information
• 7f31a05: 8319203: Parallel: Rename addr_is_marked_imprecise
• 4a85f6a: 8317132: Prepare HotSpot for permissive-
• 5207443: 8317965: TestLoadLibraryDeadlock.java fails with "Unable to load native library.: expected true, was false"
• ee57e73: 8317612: ChoiceFormat and MessageFormat constructors call non-final public method
• f262f06: 8319211: Regression in LoopOverNonConstantFP
• bfaf570: 8311546: Certificate name constraints improperly validated with leading period
• d354141: 8318694: [JVMCI] disable can_call_java in most contexts for libjvmci compiler threads
• c86592d: 8319046: Execute tests in source/class-file order in JavadocTester
• 3660a90: 8319139: Improve diagnosability of JavadocTester output
• ... and 55 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/abad0408e8317b43c2cd5bc3d324ff199aa289f5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@MBaesken Pushed as commit 53bb7cd.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.