8250668 : Clean up method_oop names in adlc

[JohnTortugo]

Relates to: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250668
Tested on: x86_64 {windows, linux, os x} x {jdk-tier1-part1..3, hotspot-tier1-gc}
Follow up from this thread: https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2020-September/039846.html

Rename occurrences of 'method_oop' under src/ to just `method'.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8250668: Clean up method_oop names in adlc

Reviewers

• Coleen Phillimore (@coleenp - Reviewer)
• Aditya Mandaleeka (@adityamandaleeka - Author)
• Tobias Hartmann (@TobiHartmann - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/164/head:pull/164
$ git checkout pull/164

[JohnTortugo]

/covered

[bridgekeeper]

Hi @JohnTortugo, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user JohnTortugo" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

[bridgekeeper]

Thank you! Please allow for a few business days to verify that your employer has signed the OCA. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

[openjdk]

@JohnTortugo The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request: hotspot.

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an RFR email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label (add|remove) "label" command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (722a3a6)

[coleenp]

Looks good! You found a couple that I missed as well. Thank you!

[openjdk]

@JohnTortugo This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. In addition to the automated checks, the change must also fulfill all project specific requirements

After integration, the commit message will be:

8250668: Clean up method_oop names in adlc

Reviewed-by: coleenp, adityam, thartmann

• If you would like to add a summary, use the /summary command.
• To credit additional contributors, use the /contributor command.
• To add additional solved issues, use the /issue command.

Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there have been 17 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 57f92d2: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null
• 65bfe09: 8253147: The javax/swing/JPopupMenu/7154841/bug7154841.java fail on big screens
• fc36328: 8253034: Update symbol generation to accomodate Git as the SCM
• 4020682: 8172366: Support SHA-3 based signatures
• 46598c8: 8253177: outputStream not declared in markWord.hpp
• 5191f31: 8251495: Remove the implNote in the DOM package description added by JDK-8249643
• 65d6c10: 8252933: com.sun.tools.jdi.ObjectReferenceImpl#validateAssignment always requests referenceType
• 74851c5: 8253169: [BACKOUT] Improve large object handling during evacuation
• b5620a3: 8253155: Minor cleanups and Javadoc fixes for LdapDnsProvider of java.naming
• d219d8b: 8253002: Remove the unused SafePointNode::_oop_map field
• ... and 7 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/ac9d1b08ee4a9f54cd75a4115adffcc4c0fb105d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge master into your branch, and then specify the current head hash when integrating, like this: /integrate 57f92d23b1049e7bfc1d54567757713ca1dd0f3c.

As you do not have Committer status in this projectan existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@coleenp, @TobiHartmann) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[JohnTortugo]

/integrate

[JohnTortugo]

@coleenp - Can you please merge this PR?

[openjdk]

@JohnTortugo
Your change (at version 722a3a6) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[TobiHartmann]

Looks good.

[TobiHartmann]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

@TobiHartmann @JohnTortugo Since your change was applied there have been 17 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 57f92d2: 8220483: Calendar.setTime(Date date) throws NPE with Date date = null
• 65bfe09: 8253147: The javax/swing/JPopupMenu/7154841/bug7154841.java fail on big screens
• fc36328: 8253034: Update symbol generation to accomodate Git as the SCM
• 4020682: 8172366: Support SHA-3 based signatures
• 46598c8: 8253177: outputStream not declared in markWord.hpp
• 5191f31: 8251495: Remove the implNote in the DOM package description added by JDK-8249643
• 65d6c10: 8252933: com.sun.tools.jdi.ObjectReferenceImpl#validateAssignment always requests referenceType
• 74851c5: 8253169: [BACKOUT] Improve large object handling during evacuation
• b5620a3: 8253155: Minor cleanups and Javadoc fixes for LdapDnsProvider of java.naming
• d219d8b: 8253002: Remove the unused SafePointNode::_oop_map field
• ... and 7 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/ac9d1b08ee4a9f54cd75a4115adffcc4c0fb105d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 2caa20a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.