Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8319174: Enhance robustness of some j.m.BigInteger constructors #16449

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor

@rgiulietti rgiulietti commented Nov 1, 2023

Enhance java.math.BigInteger constructors taking a byte[] argument by improving guarantees of internal invariants.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issues

  • JDK-8319174: Enhance robustness of some j.m.BigInteger constructors (Enhancement - P4)
  • JDK-8319327: Enhance robustness of some j.m.BigInteger constructors (CSR) (Withdrawn)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16449/head:pull/16449
$ git checkout pull/16449

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16449
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16449/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16449

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16449

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16449.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 1, 2023

👋 Welcome back rgiulietti! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 1, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2023

@rgiulietti The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 1, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 1, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Nov 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Nov 3, 2023
@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor Author

/csr unneeded

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2023

@rgiulietti determined that a CSR request is not needed for this pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2023

@rgiulietti This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8319174: Enhance robustness of some j.m.BigInteger constructors

Reviewed-by: rriggs, darcy

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 131 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a95062b: 8319670: Improve comments describing system properties for TLS server and client for max chain length
  • 38745ec: 8319649: inline_boxing_calls unused gvn variable
  • 636a351: 8319429: Resetting MXCSR flags degrades ecore
  • d7b0ba9: 8319554: Select LogOutput* directly for stdout and stderr
  • 68110b7: 8319574: Exec/process tests should be marked as flagless
  • 7b971c1: 8319705: RISC-V: signumF/D intrinsics fails compiler/intrinsics/math/TestSignumIntrinsic.java
  • f939542: 8319324: FFM: Reformat javadocs
  • a3f1b33: 8319664: IGV always output on PhaseRemoveUseless
  • f57b78c: 8319726: Parallel GC: Re-use object in object-iterator
  • 4451a92: 8319748: [JVMCI] TestUseCompressedOopsFlagsWithUlimit.java crashes on libgraal
  • ... and 121 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e05cafda78a37dbeb2df2edd791be19d22edaece...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jddarcy jddarcy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

May want to add some assert to verify the stated pre-conditions hold.

@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2023

Going to push as commit a64fc48.
Since your change was applied there have been 132 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9cce9fe: 8319256: Print more diagnostic information when an unexpected user is found in a Phi
  • a95062b: 8319670: Improve comments describing system properties for TLS server and client for max chain length
  • 38745ec: 8319649: inline_boxing_calls unused gvn variable
  • 636a351: 8319429: Resetting MXCSR flags degrades ecore
  • d7b0ba9: 8319554: Select LogOutput* directly for stdout and stderr
  • 68110b7: 8319574: Exec/process tests should be marked as flagless
  • 7b971c1: 8319705: RISC-V: signumF/D intrinsics fails compiler/intrinsics/math/TestSignumIntrinsic.java
  • f939542: 8319324: FFM: Reformat javadocs
  • a3f1b33: 8319664: IGV always output on PhaseRemoveUseless
  • f57b78c: 8319726: Parallel GC: Re-use object in object-iterator
  • ... and 122 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e05cafda78a37dbeb2df2edd791be19d22edaece...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 10, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2023

@rgiulietti Pushed as commit a64fc48.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@rgiulietti rgiulietti deleted the 8319174 branch November 27, 2023 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants