-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8319450: New methods java.net.InetXAddress.ofLiteral() miss @since tag #16511
Conversation
👋 Welcome back marchof! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah - sorry we missed this in the review (and CSR). Thanks for catching it!
@marchof This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@dfuch, @AlekseiEfimov, @vyommani, @jaikiran) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Marc,
Thanks for catching and fixing this miss from the original change.
Looks good to me.
@AlekseiEfimov @dfuch Thanks for taking a look! As I'm not a committer I would need a sponsor to merge this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks OK to me.
The changes look good to me. I'll go ahead and sponsor this. /sponsor |
/integrate |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 419ed90.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16511/head:pull/16511
$ git checkout pull/16511
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16511
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16511/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16511
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16511
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16511.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment