Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8319455: Test compiler/print/CompileCommandMemLimit.java times out #16515

Conversation

tstuefe
Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe commented Nov 6, 2023

A test that deliberately crashes creates a core dump, and since neither heap size is limited nor core dumps are switched off this timeouts if we are unlucky.

Solution: pass CreateCoreDumpOnCrash to the test and limit heap size too. Thanks to @dholmes-ora for the quick analysis.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8319455: Test compiler/print/CompileCommandMemLimit.java times out (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16515/head:pull/16515
$ git checkout pull/16515

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16515
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16515/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16515

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16515

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16515.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2023

@tstuefe The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 6, 2023
@tstuefe tstuefe marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2023 10:45
@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Nov 6, 2023

mac os test error unrelated

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2023

@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8319455: Test compiler/print/CompileCommandMemLimit.java times out

Reviewed-by: thartmann, chagedorn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1c2ea1d: 8319153: Fix: Class is a raw type in ProcessTools
  • 96e6e67: 4365952: Cannot disable JFileChooser
  • 2d4bbf4: 8319465: Typos in javadoc of com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean methods
  • 8fb94fd: 8319379: G1: gc/logging/TestUnifiedLoggingSwitchStress.java crashes after JDK-8318894
  • b5c863b: 8316533: C2 compilation fails with assert(verify(phase)) failed: missing Value() optimization
  • 377138c: 8318959: C2: define MachNode::fill_new_machnode() statically

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 6, 2023
Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Nov 6, 2023

Thanks @TobiHartmann and @chhagedorn !

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Going to push as commit b3126b6.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1c2ea1d: 8319153: Fix: Class is a raw type in ProcessTools
  • 96e6e67: 4365952: Cannot disable JFileChooser
  • 2d4bbf4: 8319465: Typos in javadoc of com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean methods
  • 8fb94fd: 8319379: G1: gc/logging/TestUnifiedLoggingSwitchStress.java crashes after JDK-8318894
  • b5c863b: 8316533: C2 compilation fails with assert(verify(phase)) failed: missing Value() optimization
  • 377138c: 8318959: C2: define MachNode::fill_new_machnode() statically

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2023

@tstuefe Pushed as commit b3126b6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants