Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8319436: Proxy.newProxyInstance throws NPE if loader is null and interface not visible from class loader #16525

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mlchung
Copy link
Member

@mlchung mlchung commented Nov 6, 2023

This is a regression caused by JDK-8302791. IAE should be thrown when an interface is not visible to the given class loader but NPE is thrown instead when the loader is null. The boot loader has no name and so the fix will print null in the exception message. test/jdk/java/lang/reflect/Proxy/ClassRestrictions.java is converted to junit and updated to test IAE thrown because proxy interface is not visible to null loader.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8319436: Proxy.newProxyInstance throws NPE if loader is null and interface not visible from class loader (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16525/head:pull/16525
$ git checkout pull/16525

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16525
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16525/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16525

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16525

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16525.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back mchung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2023

@mlchung The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix to getLoaderNameID looks fine, the update and conversion of the test looks okay too.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2023

@mlchung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8319436: Proxy.newProxyInstance throws NPE if loader is null and interface not visible from class loader

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 419ed90: 8319450: New methods java.net.InetXAddress.ofLiteral() miss @SInCE tag
  • 439ed04: 8319233: AArch64: Build failure with clang due to -Wformat-nonliteral warning
  • e4803e0: 8318580: "javax/swing/MultiMonitor/MultimonVImage.java failing with Error. Can't find library: /open/test/jdk/java/awt/regtesthelpers" after JDK-8316053

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 7, 2023
@mlchung
Copy link
Member Author

mlchung commented Nov 7, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Going to push as commit 8eb6f61.
Since your change was applied there have been 23 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8274713: 8314891: Additional Zip64 extra header validation
  • 0dcd730: 8318594: NMT: VM.native_memory crashes on assert if functionality isn't supported by OS
  • 45e68ae: 8319532: jshell - Non-sealed declarations sometimes break a snippet evaluation
  • 4a0ad46: 8317937: @sealedGraph: Links to inner classes fails in links
  • 134c382: 8319560: Reformat method parameters in the FFM API
  • ef8c840: 8319607: FFM: Review the language in the FFM documentation
  • bf9a93d: 8319204: G1: Change G1CMTask::_termination_time_ms to wallclock time
  • b2504a0: 8319525: RISC-V: Rename *_riscv64.ad files to *_riscv.ad under riscv/gc
  • bfafb27: 8319615: IGV incomplete gitignore
  • c760097: 8319541: G1: Inline G1RemoveSelfForwardsTask into RestoreRetainedRegionsTask
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/cdf337357a62dd52c00e56e75912565e15b6adfd...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 7, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 7, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 7, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2023

@mlchung Pushed as commit 8eb6f61.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@mlchung mlchung deleted the JDK-8319436 branch February 22, 2024 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants