-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8315969: compiler/rangechecks/TestRangeCheckHoistingScaledIV.java: make flagless #16746
8315969: compiler/rangechecks/TestRangeCheckHoistingScaledIV.java: make flagless #16746
Conversation
👋 Welcome back enikitin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@lepestock The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
…TestRangeCheckHoistingScaledIV_vm_flagless/pub
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Please add a comment to JDK-8316124 to keep track of removing the limitation.
@lepestock This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TobiHartmann, @chhagedorn) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, too.
/integrate |
@lepestock |
Raised the JDK-8320495. |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 9598ff8.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TobiHartmann @lepestock Pushed as commit 9598ff8. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
A recent improvement (JDK-8314838) changed dependant VM creation in that test - we now forward given arguments via 'ProcessTools.createTestJvm()'. It has been revealed, however, that the test doesn't work well with '-Xcomp'. A bug (JDK-8316124) has been filed.
I suggest to temporarily make test 'vm.flagless' to allow for running the test in CI. As soon as JDK-8316124 is fixed, we'll remove that limitation.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16746/head:pull/16746
$ git checkout pull/16746
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16746
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16746/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16746
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16746
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16746.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment