-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8245309: Re-examine use of ThreadLocalCoders in sun.net.www.ParseUtil #170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jboes! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@FrauBoes The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request: When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an RFR email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Drive-by benchmark comments below.
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/net/ThreadLocalParseUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/net/ThreadLocalParseUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/net/ThreadLocalParseUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/net/ThreadLocalParseUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/net/ThreadLocalParseUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Julia,
The code changes look good to me. For the benchmarks, I'll defer to the experts.
best regards,
-- daniel
@FrauBoes This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. In addition to the automated checks, the change must also fulfill all project specific requirements After integration, the commit message will be:
Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there have been 19 commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Updated benchmark results: before after |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Benchmark code looks good otherwise.
test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/net/ThreadLocalParseUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated changes to ParseUtil look good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated changes look good to me as well.
/integrate |
@FrauBoes Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit e0cf023. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Replaced the use of ThreadLocalCoders with regular non-caching CharsetEncoder and added a benchmark to confirm that there is no performance impact.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/170/head:pull/170
$ git checkout pull/170