-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8321713: Harmonize executeTestJvm with create[Limited]TestJavaProcessBuilder #17049
Conversation
👋 Welcome back stefank! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@stefank The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
@stefank This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for the reviews! |
/integrate |
JDK-8315097: 'Rename createJavaProcessBuilder' changed the name of the ProcessTools helper functions used to create
ProcessBuilder
s used to spawn new java test processes.We now have
createTestJavaProcessBuilder
andcreateLimitedTestJavaProcess
. The former prepends jvm options from jtreg, while the latter doesn't.With these functions it is common to see the following pattern in tests:
We have a couple of thin wrapper in
ProcessTools
that does exactly this, so that the code can be written as a one-liner:I propose that we name this functions using the same naming scheme we used for
createTestJavaProcessBuilder
andcreateLimitedTestJavaProcessBuilder
. That is, we changeexecuteTestJvm
toexecuteTestJava
and add a newexecuteLimitedTestJava
function.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17049/head:pull/17049
$ git checkout pull/17049
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17049
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17049/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17049
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17049
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17049.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment