Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8321713: Harmonize executeTestJvm with create[Limited]TestJavaProcessBuilder #17049

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

stefank
Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank commented Dec 11, 2023

JDK-8315097: 'Rename createJavaProcessBuilder' changed the name of the ProcessTools helper functions used to create ProcessBuilders used to spawn new java test processes.

We now have createTestJavaProcessBuilder and createLimitedTestJavaProcess. The former prepends jvm options from jtreg, while the latter doesn't.

With these functions it is common to see the following pattern in tests:

ProcessBuilder pb = ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder(...);
OutputAnalyzer output = executeProcess(pb);

We have a couple of thin wrapper in ProcessTools that does exactly this, so that the code can be written as a one-liner:

OutputAnalyzer output = ProcessTools.executeTestJvm();

I propose that we name this functions using the same naming scheme we used for createTestJavaProcessBuilder and createLimitedTestJavaProcessBuilder. That is, we change executeTestJvm to executeTestJava and add a new executeLimitedTestJava function.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8321713: Harmonize executeTestJvm with create[Limited]TestJavaProcessBuilder (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17049/head:pull/17049
$ git checkout pull/17049

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17049
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17049/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17049

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17049

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17049.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 11, 2023

👋 Welcome back stefank! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 11, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2023

@stefank The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • hotspot
  • i18n
  • security
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added security security-dev@openjdk.org serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Dec 11, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 11, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@lkorinth lkorinth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2023

@stefank This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8321713: Harmonize executeTestJvm with create[Limited]TestJavaProcessBuilder

Reviewed-by: lkorinth, lmesnik

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 11, 2023
@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Jan 2, 2024

Thanks for the reviews!

@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Jan 3, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Going to push as commit cbe329b.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 06dd735: 8322766: Micro bench SSLHandshake should use default algorithms

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2024

@stefank Pushed as commit cbe329b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants