-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8322154: RISC-V: JDK-8315743 missed change in MacroAssembler::load_reserved #17117
Conversation
👋 Welcome back gcao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! I think we should also fix this for JDK-22.
@zifeihan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RealFYang, @robehn, @luhenry) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, thank you!
Thanks all for the review. |
I notice some of RV PRs goes a bit fast. Note https://openjdk.org/guide/ -> "Allow enough time for review". |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 59073fa.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
The fix for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315743 touches MacroAssembler::load_reserved replacing
t0
withdst
. But it missed change for the third case (that isuint32
) of the switch in this assember function. We should also replacet0
used inzero_extend
withdst
. @robehn can you help confirm this?Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17117/head:pull/17117
$ git checkout pull/17117
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17117
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17117/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17117
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17117
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17117.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment