-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8322583: RISC-V: Enable fast class initialization checks #17192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back gcao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Oh, it was only in draft :)
@zifeihan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 57 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@robehn, @RealFYang, @feilongjiang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks!
Thanks all for the review. |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 5235cc9.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealFYang @zifeihan Pushed as commit 5235cc9. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
/backport jdk21u-dev |
@zifeihan the backport was successfully created on the branch backport-zifeihan-5235cc98 in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk21u-dev. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk21u-dev:master, just click the following link: The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:
If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk21u-dev:
|
Hi, Please review this small change enabling fast class initialization checks on linux-riscv. As discussed on [1], we noticed that VM_Version::supports_fast_class_init_checks is false on linux-riscv64 platform. But the needed code of this optimization on this platform is there which is supposed to solve a performance issue https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8219233 at that time. I found that this performance issue is still reproduciable on linux-riscv64. And the original performance issue reported by JDK-8219233 is resolved when this optimization is enabled (x2.5 improvement for reported case on linux-riscv64).
Once this is in, I'd like to request approval for backporting to JDK 21u and JDK 17u since corresponding fixes for the other ports are already there, unless the community feels otherwise.
[1] #17006 (comment)
OpenJDK23 linux-riscv64 when setting VM_Version::supports_fast_class_init_checks returns false(default):
OpenJDK23 linux-riscv64 when setting VM_Version::supports_fast_class_init_checks returns true:
Testing:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17192/head:pull/17192
$ git checkout pull/17192
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17192
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17192/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17192
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17192
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17192.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment