Skip to content

Conversation

@kimbarrett
Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett commented Jan 2, 2024

Please review this change to eliminate some -Wparentheses warnings. This
involved simply adding a few parentheses to make some implicit operator
precedence explicit.

Testing: mach5 tier1

Also ran mach5 tier1 with these changes in conjunction enabling -Wparentheses
and other changes needed to make that work.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8322806: Eliminate -Wparentheses warnings in aarch64 code (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17210/head:pull/17210
$ git checkout pull/17210

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17210
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17210/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17210

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17210

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17210.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 2, 2024

👋 Welcome back kbarrett! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 2, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 2, 2024

@kimbarrett The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 2, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 2, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine. FWIW, the second usage of ret looks redundant.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 2, 2024

@kimbarrett This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8322806: Eliminate -Wparentheses warnings in aarch64 code

Reviewed-by: stefank, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks

&& fp() == other.fp()
&& pc() == other.pc();
assert(!ret || ret && cb() == other.cb() && _deopt_state == other._deopt_state, "inconsistent construction");
assert(!ret || (ret && cb() == other.cb() && _deopt_state == other._deopt_state), "inconsistent construction");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well... Since || is short-cutting, then on the right side of ||, we can be sure that !ret was false (shortcut not taken), which means ret was true, which means ret && is redundant?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree:
#17210 (review)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, and updated.

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

Thanks for reviews @dholmes-ora , @stefank , and comment from @shipilev .

@kimbarrett
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Going to push as commit d75d876.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 8, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 8, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 8, 2024

@kimbarrett Pushed as commit d75d876.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@kimbarrett kimbarrett deleted the aarch64-wparentheses branch January 8, 2024 07:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants