-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8322981: Fix 2 locations in JDI that throw IOException without using the "Caused by" exception #17258
Conversation
👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Setting the cause is good, but do you not also want an informative message?
Not necessary.
produces:
If I change the second throw to:
You get:
So it appears that for the first line of the prinstStackTrace() output, it prints the exception name and then the message if there is one. If there is no message then it instead prints the cause exception name, and its message if it has one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay - thanks. Change is trivial.
@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 21 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for the reviews David and Leonid! /integrate |
Going to push as commit 46965a0.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@plummercj Pushed as commit 46965a0. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Use "cause" argument when rethrowing an exception. See CR for details on how this helps.
Tested with all of tier1, and also ran tier2 and tier4 svc tests.
I'd like to push this as a trivial change.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17258/head:pull/17258
$ git checkout pull/17258
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17258
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17258/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17258
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17258
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17258.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment