Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8322980: Debug agent's dumpThread() API should update thread's name before printing it #17259

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

plummercj
Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj commented Jan 4, 2024

In threadControl.c, at build time you can decide to keep track of thread names by compiling with "#define DEBUG_THREADNAME". If this is also a debug build, some extra debugging functions are included in the build, including "dumpThread(ThreadNode *node)". These are intended to be called from gdb, or possibly from somewhere in the debug agent implementation, to aid with debugging. When dumpThread() prints the thread's name, it just uses the name that was stored when the thread was created. However, the thread name can change, so dumpThread() should really fetch the current thread name and print it.

I also added some commented out code to print other useful fields of the ThreadNode, including the ThreadState. These can be enabled by the user as needed.

Tested with all of tier1, and also ran tier2 and tier4 svc tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8322980: Debug agent's dumpThread() API should update thread's name before printing it (Enhancement - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17259/head:pull/17259
$ git checkout pull/17259

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17259
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17259/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17259

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17259

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17259.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 4, 2024

👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8322980 8322980: Debug agent's dumpThread() API should update thread's name before printing it Jan 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 4, 2024

@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 4, 2024
@plummercj plummercj marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2024 02:10
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 4, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 4, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good I think.

A future idea could be to have these ifdefs active in the debug JDK build. I wouldn't normally run the debugger from the debug build, but if you wanted this extra info it would be more convenient if it was in the debug JDK bundle.

(The changed output might fool some tests so would need checking, but might be worth considering.)

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

A future idea could be to have these ifdefs active in the debug JDK build. I wouldn't normally run the debugger from the debug build, but if you wanted this extra info it would be more convenient if it was in the debug JDK bundle.

Possibly DEBUG_THREADNAME should be enabled in debug builds, but I opted not to long ago because of the potential footprint and performance cost. For the #if 0 code, generally speaking it results in too much output and is really just meant as examples of other things you might want to include in the output, but most cases you would prefer not to have all of it. A possible solution would be to have each line of output controlled by a global variable (either a bitwise flag or a global per line), and then the user could enable additional output at runtime (from within gdb), but I don't feel this is worth the effort.

There aren't any test output concern unless you introduce calls to these API, in which case they are a concern whether or not all the #if 0 stuff is included.

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could I get one more review please.

jint state = 0;
jvmtiError error = FUNC_PTR(gdata->jvmti,GetThreadState)
(gdata->jvmti, node->thread, &state);
return state;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: The indent in this file is 4, not 2.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
Q: Do you want to keep the debugging code under #ifdef ... #endif?

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2024

@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8322980: Debug agent's dumpThread() API should update thread's name before printing it

Reviewed-by: kevinw, sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 34 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 35a1b77: 8322636: [JVMCI] HotSpotSpeculationLog can be inconsistent across a single compile
  • 46965a0: 8322981: Fix 2 locations in JDI that throw IOException without using the "Caused by" exception
  • 700c25f: 8322954: Shenandoah: Convert evac-update closures asserts to rich asserts
  • 631a9f6: 8323073: ProblemList gc/g1/TestSkipRebuildRemsetPhase.java on linux-aarch64
  • ed9f324: 8322985: [BACKOUT] 8318562: Computational test more than 2x slower when AVX instructions are used
  • ade21a9: 8310844: [AArch64] C1 compilation fails because monitor offset in OSR buffer is too large for immediate
  • f0cfd36: 8322532: JShell : Unnamed variable issue
  • 78623c9: 8323012: C2 fails with fatal error: no reachable node should have no use
  • f0e2e43: 8323021: Shenandoah: Encountered reference count always attributed to first worker thread
  • 3dc4bd8: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/54b3ceeca27b67f4270d8b700b072f46959dba65...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 5, 2024
@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good. Q: Do you want to keep the debugging code under #ifdef ... #endif?

Yes. The "#ifdef DEBUG_THREADNAME" is something that I want the user to have to manually enable at build time to avoid the memory and performance impact. Also, "#if 0" code generates extra output that normally you don't want, but I wanted to leave the code there as examples and so it can be easily enabled when needed."

@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the reviews Kevin and Serguei!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Going to push as commit 387828a.
Since your change was applied there have been 54 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c4a83bd: 8323086: Shenandoah: Heap could be corrupted by oom during evacuation
  • 827c71d: 8310190: C2 SuperWord: AlignVector is broken, generates misaligned packs
  • 2acb5bd: 8322790: RISC-V: Tune costs for shuffles with no conversion
  • c8fa3e2: 8320310: CompiledMethod::has_monitors flag can be incorrect
  • 57a65fe: 8322003: JShell - Incorrect type inference in lists of records implementing interfaces
  • c90768c: 8318444: Write details about compilation bailouts into crash reports
  • 29397d2: 8320317: ObjectMonitor NotRunnable is not really an optimization
  • fc04750: 8321371: SpinPause() not implemented for bsd_aarch64/macOS
  • 458e563: 8310711: [IR Framework] Remove safepoint while printing handling
  • 71aac7a: 8276809: java/awt/font/JNICheck/FreeTypeScalerJNICheck.java shows JNI warning on Windows
  • ... and 44 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/54b3ceeca27b67f4270d8b700b072f46959dba65...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 8, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 8, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 8, 2024

@plummercj Pushed as commit 387828a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants