-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8323065: Unneccesary CodeBlob lookup in CompiledIC::internal_set_ic_destination #17281
8323065: Unneccesary CodeBlob lookup in CompiledIC::internal_set_ic_destination #17281
Conversation
👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 31 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me too.
Thanks! I am going to integrate it then. /integrate |
Going to push as commit eb9e754.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
I was looking at hotpath for IC stub cleaning (happens at safepoint), and one obvious thing is that we look-up
CodeBlob
fromcall->instruction_address()
only to assert that is compiled one. It used to be protected by#ifdef ASSERT
before JDK-8212681, and pulled from it to be used in Mutex in JDK 12: https://hg.openjdk.org/jdk/jdk/rev/d6dc479bcdd3#l15.62 And the Mutex was shortly gone after JDK-8214257. So we are exposing this code to product binaries since JDK 12.This fix reinstates the
ASSERT
block again. There are small improvements (~1..10us) for safepoint cleanup on small ad-hoc tests in release builds on my Mac. But since this whole thing involves looking up things in code cache, it may cost quite a lot.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17281/head:pull/17281
$ git checkout pull/17281
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17281
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17281/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17281
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17281
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17281.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment