Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8323296: java/lang/Thread/virtual/stress/GetStackTraceALotWhenPinned.java#id1 timed out #17353

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman commented Jan 10, 2024

This test was recently dialled down via JDK-8323002 but it still makes slow progress on some test machines, esp. macox-x64-debug builds. The issue is that the sampling of the target thread is skewed towards the unmounted case so the target thread is disabled from being scheduled and doesn't make progress. The test is re-worked to use a barrier so that the main thread and target virtual thread run in lock step. This allows the virtual thread to make progress at each iteration and also increases the chances of sampling the stack trace at around the time that the target thread transitions from being unmounted (due to the Thread.yield) and parking while pinned.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8323296: java/lang/Thread/virtual/stress/GetStackTraceALotWhenPinned.java#id1 timed out (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17353/head:pull/17353
$ git checkout pull/17353

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17353
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17353/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17353

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17353

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17353.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 10, 2024

👋 Welcome back alanb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 10, 2024

@AlanBateman The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 10, 2024
@AlanBateman AlanBateman marked this pull request as ready for review January 11, 2024 07:41
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 11, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 11, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you Alan, the changes look good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2024

@AlanBateman This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8323296: java/lang/Thread/virtual/stress/GetStackTraceALotWhenPinned.java#id1 timed out

Reviewed-by: jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 43 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8e12053: 8322799: Test JPKG003-013: ServiceTest fails because the user cannot uninstall the "servicetest" package on OEL 9.2 x64 and OEL 9.2 64-bit Arm (aarch64)
  • e4389d8: 8323571: Regression in source resolution process
  • 49e6121: 8310813: Simplify and modernize equals, hashCode, and compareTo for BigInteger
  • 4ea7b36: 8322235: Split up and improve LocaleProvidersRun
  • 93bedd7: 8323213: Fix some javadoc broken links in ObjectReference, and other misc javadoc cleanups
  • b78896b: 8319571: Update jni/nullCaller/NullCallerTest.java to accept flags or mark as flagless
  • e10d140: 8321712: C2: "failed: Multiple uses of register" in C2_MacroAssembler::vminmax_fp
  • c2e77e2: 8319128: sun/security/pkcs11 tests fail on OL 7.9 aarch64
  • 9fd855e: 8322971: KEM.getInstance() should check if a 3rd-party security provider is signed
  • b8ae4a8: 8320890: [AIX] Find a better way to mimic dl handle equality
  • ... and 33 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f4ca41ad75fa78a08ff069ba0b6ac3596e35c23d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 12, 2024
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Going to push as commit e72723d.
Since your change was applied there have been 47 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 66520be: 8280056: gtest/LargePageGtests.java#use-large-pages failed "os.release_one_mapping_multi_commits_vm"
  • 82a63a0: 8258979: The image didn't show correctly with GTK LAF
  • 8d9814a: 8322757: Enable -Wparentheses warnings
  • 0ff2dea: 8320673: PageFormat/CustomPaper.java has no Pass/Fail buttons; multiple instructions
  • 8e12053: 8322799: Test JPKG003-013: ServiceTest fails because the user cannot uninstall the "servicetest" package on OEL 9.2 x64 and OEL 9.2 64-bit Arm (aarch64)
  • e4389d8: 8323571: Regression in source resolution process
  • 49e6121: 8310813: Simplify and modernize equals, hashCode, and compareTo for BigInteger
  • 4ea7b36: 8322235: Split up and improve LocaleProvidersRun
  • 93bedd7: 8323213: Fix some javadoc broken links in ObjectReference, and other misc javadoc cleanups
  • b78896b: 8319571: Update jni/nullCaller/NullCallerTest.java to accept flags or mark as flagless
  • ... and 37 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f4ca41ad75fa78a08ff069ba0b6ac3596e35c23d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 12, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2024

@AlanBateman Pushed as commit e72723d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants