-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8323515: Create test alias "all" for all test roots #17422
Conversation
👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@shipilev The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay - change is harmless with no ongoing maintenance cost.
@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 111 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Any other reviews needed for this? Nominally, this changes the test groups in langtools, so maybe @lahodaj or @biboudis want to take a look. For jaxp, @JoeWang-Java, maybe? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the reminder. The new alias is nice, easier to run all tier tests. I often run xml-only as well that includes jaxp_all plus a small set of jaxp tests in jdk_all (test/jdk/javax/xml/jaxp). But that's just me, jdk_all already covers those tests.
I have nothing against it, but I don't think I know enough about details of jtreg configuration to provide approval. OTOH, I personally don't see a strong need for it. |
All right, thanks! @lmesnik, I realized I forgot to ask if you had objections to this. |
Thank you all! /integrate |
Going to push as commit 8b9bf75.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Since recent work to improve
tier4
performance, we actually testtier{1,2,3,4}
often, which includes all the tests in current tree. It would be more convenient to just have theall
test group/alias, so that we can domake test TEST=all
. This also gives a parallelism / run time benefit, as we do not wait for tests in each tier to complete before moving to next tier.Sample run on out-of-the-box Linux x86_64 fastdebug is below. For some environments one also needs to supply a few keywords like
!printer
to skip tests that cannot complete without failure due to misconfiguration. I left the keywords as is to show how would a failing run look. There is also an existing shortcut in build system that allows to run this withmake test-all
.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17422/head:pull/17422
$ git checkout pull/17422
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17422
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17422/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17422
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17422
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17422.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment