-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8324513: Inline ContiguousSpace::object_iterate_from #17531
Conversation
👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
void ContiguousSpace::object_iterate(ObjectClosure* blk) { | ||
if (is_empty()) return; | ||
object_iterate_from(bottom(), blk); | ||
} | ||
|
||
void ContiguousSpace::object_iterate_from(HeapWord* mark, ObjectClosure* blk) { | ||
while (mark < top()) { | ||
blk->do_object(cast_to_oop(mark)); | ||
mark += cast_to_oop(mark)->size(); | ||
HeapWord* addr = bottom(); | ||
while (addr < top()) { | ||
oop obj = cast_to_oop(addr); | ||
blk->do_object(obj); | ||
addr += obj->size(); | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given that this function now grows beyond a small two-liner implementation, I would prefer if the is_empty
check was separated from the rest of the code. Something like this:
void ContiguousSpace::object_iterate(ObjectClosure* blk) {
if (is_empty()) {
return;
}
HeapWord* addr = bottom();
while (addr < top()) {
oop obj = cast_to_oop(addr);
blk->do_object(obj);
addr += obj->size();
}
}
With that said, it seems like the is_empty()
boils down to a comparison between bottom()
and top()
. If that is the case, then we could just remove the is_empty()
check and let that be handled by the while loop.
@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for review. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 2a01c79.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 2a01c79. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Trivial refactoring of inlining a method.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17531/head:pull/17531
$ git checkout pull/17531
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17531
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17531/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17531
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17531
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17531.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment