Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8317636: Improve heap walking API tests to verify correctness of field indexes #17580

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

alexmenkov
Copy link

@alexmenkov alexmenkov commented Jan 25, 2024

The fix adds new test for FollowReferences JVMTI function to verify correctness of reported field indexes.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8317636: Improve heap walking API tests to verify correctness of field indexes (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17580/head:pull/17580
$ git checkout pull/17580

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17580
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17580/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17580

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17580

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17580.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 25, 2024

👋 Welcome back amenkov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2024

@alexmenkov The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 25, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 25, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2024

@alexmenkov This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8317636: Improve heap walking API tests to verify correctness of field indexes

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 104 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a18b03b: 8324635: (zipfs) Regression in Files.setPosixFilePermissions called on existing MSDOS entries
  • 7476e29: 8323680: SA PointerFinder code can do a better job of leveraging existing code to determine if an address is in the TLAB
  • 63cb1f8: 8321396: Retire test/jdk/java/util/zip/NoExtensionSignature.java
  • f613e13: 8313739: ZipOutputStream.close() should always close the wrapped stream
  • adc3604: 8325148: Enable restricted javac warning in java.base
  • 1ae8513: 8324858: [vectorapi] Bounds checking issues when accessing memory segments
  • 38c0197: 8318105: [jmh] the test java.security.HSS failed with 2 active threads
  • 6787c4c: 8325055: Rename Injector.h
  • 91d8dac: 8325137: com/sun/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadCpuTimeArray.java can fail in Xcomp with out of expected range
  • 783ae56: 8311893: Interactive component with ARIA role 'tabpanel' does not have a programmatically associated name
  • ... and 94 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3d32c460eb60aa95f27c96bbefdf784f6a7663f7...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice test, thank you for developing it!
Looks good.

@alexmenkov
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2024

Going to push as commit f31957e.
Since your change was applied there have been 125 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 5, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 5, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 5, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2024

@alexmenkov Pushed as commit f31957e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@alexmenkov alexmenkov deleted the field_index_test branch February 5, 2024 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants