Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8324236: compiler/ciReplay/TestInliningProtectionDomain.java failed with RuntimeException: should only dump inline information for ... expected true, was false #17598

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chhagedorn
Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn commented Jan 26, 2024

The test failed when trying to match the compile id of the interesting method by looking for "<nmethod compile_id='2" in this line:

<nmethod compile_id='2' compiler='c2' entry='0x000000010e293f40' size='680' address='0x000000010e293d90' relocation_offset='360' insts_offset='432' stub_offset='568' scopes_data_offset='616' scopes_pcs_offset='624' dependencies_offset='672' oops_offset='600' metadata_offset='608' method='compiler.ciReplay.ProtectionDomainTestNoOtherCompilationPrivateString test ()V' bytes='5' count='6784' iicount='6784' stamp='0.307'/>

But it first found the earlier line:

<nmethod compile_id='20' compile_kind='c2n' compiler='' entry='0x000000010e28b6c0' size='544' address='0x000000010e28b510' relocation_offset='360' insts_offset='432' method='java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle linkToStatic (ILjava/lang/invoke/MemberName;)Ljava/lang/Object;' bytes='0' count='0' iicount='0' stamp='0.213'/>

which unfortunately also matched "<nmethod compile_id='2". I suggest to make the check stronger by adding a closing ' which should then only match "<nmethod compile_id='2'"

Thanks,
Christian


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8324236: compiler/ciReplay/TestInliningProtectionDomain.java failed with RuntimeException: should only dump inline information for ... expected true, was false (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17598/head:pull/17598
$ git checkout pull/17598

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17598
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17598/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17598

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17598

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17598.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

…ith RuntimeException: should only dump inline information for ... expected true, was false
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 26, 2024

👋 Welcome back chagedorn! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 26, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 26, 2024

@chhagedorn The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 26, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 26, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good and trivial.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 26, 2024

@chhagedorn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8324236: compiler/ciReplay/TestInliningProtectionDomain.java failed with RuntimeException: should only dump inline information for ... expected true, was false

Reviewed-by: kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 110 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 26, 2024
@chhagedorn
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Vladimir for your review!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 29, 2024

Going to push as commit 72ba817.
Since your change was applied there have been 121 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 29, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 29, 2024

@chhagedorn Pushed as commit 72ba817.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants