-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8324236: compiler/ciReplay/TestInliningProtectionDomain.java failed with RuntimeException: should only dump inline information for ... expected true, was false #17598
Conversation
…ith RuntimeException: should only dump inline information for ... expected true, was false
👋 Welcome back chagedorn! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@chhagedorn The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good and trivial.
@chhagedorn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 110 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks Vladimir for your review! /integrate |
Going to push as commit 72ba817.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@chhagedorn Pushed as commit 72ba817. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The test failed when trying to match the compile id of the interesting method by looking for "
<nmethod compile_id='2
" in this line:But it first found the earlier line:
which unfortunately also matched "
<nmethod compile_id='2
". I suggest to make the check stronger by adding a closing'
which should then only match "<nmethod compile_id='2'
"Thanks,
Christian
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17598/head:pull/17598
$ git checkout pull/17598
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17598
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17598/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17598
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17598
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17598.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment