Skip to content

JDK-8257959: Add gtest run with -XX:+UseLargePages #1763

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

tstuefe
Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe commented Dec 14, 2020

Hi,

may I please have reviews for this addition.

To better test changes in large page handling, it makes sense to regularly run gtests with large pages enabled. Not the whole gtest suite needs to be run, but at least the os* part.

Thanks, Thomas


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1763/head:pull/1763
$ git checkout pull/1763

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 14, 2020

👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 14, 2020

@tstuefe The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 14, 2020
@tstuefe tstuefe force-pushed the JDK-8257959-add-gtests-for-large-pages branch from f728a37 to 21da508 Compare December 14, 2020 12:51
@tstuefe tstuefe marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2020 15:24
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 14, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 14, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@lfoltan lfoltan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
Lois

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 14, 2020

@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8257959: Add gtest run with -XX:+UseLargePages

Reviewed-by: lfoltan, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 386 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 707bce0: 8257212: (bf spec) Clarify byte order of the buffer returned by CharBuffer.subsequence(int,int)
  • 0ec2c96: 8259820: JShell does not handle -source 8 properly
  • b01a15e: 8258884: [TEST_BUG] Convert applet-based test open/test/jdk/javax/swing/JMenuItem/8031573/bug8031573.java to a regular java test
  • 6d4a593: 8259627: Potential memory leaks in JVMTI after JDK-8227745
  • 2c8e337: 8259622: TreeMap.computeIfAbsent deviates from spec
  • d701bab: Merge
  • 4307fa6: 8253505: JFR: onFlush invoked out of order with a sorted event stream
  • 0148adf: 8255120: C2: assert(outer->outcnt() >= phis + 2 && outer->outcnt() <= phis + 2 + stores + 1) failed: only phis
  • 90960c5: 8252657: JVMTI agent is not unloaded when Agent_OnAttach is failed
  • e3b548a: 8257736: InputStream from BodyPublishers.ofInputStream() leaks when IOE happens
  • ... and 376 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/c30fff7c329f1542c67df1500873ca663e7e3e70...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 14, 2020
@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Dec 14, 2020

Looks good.
Lois

Thank you Lois!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 11, 2021

@tstuefe This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Jan 12, 2021

Gentle ping. May I have another review please?

Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Jan 15, 2021

Lgtm

Thanks, Thomas!

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Jan 15, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 15, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 15, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2021

@tstuefe Since your change was applied there have been 386 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 707bce0: 8257212: (bf spec) Clarify byte order of the buffer returned by CharBuffer.subsequence(int,int)
  • 0ec2c96: 8259820: JShell does not handle -source 8 properly
  • b01a15e: 8258884: [TEST_BUG] Convert applet-based test open/test/jdk/javax/swing/JMenuItem/8031573/bug8031573.java to a regular java test
  • 6d4a593: 8259627: Potential memory leaks in JVMTI after JDK-8227745
  • 2c8e337: 8259622: TreeMap.computeIfAbsent deviates from spec
  • d701bab: Merge
  • 4307fa6: 8253505: JFR: onFlush invoked out of order with a sorted event stream
  • 0148adf: 8255120: C2: assert(outer->outcnt() >= phis + 2 && outer->outcnt() <= phis + 2 + stores + 1) failed: only phis
  • 90960c5: 8252657: JVMTI agent is not unloaded when Agent_OnAttach is failed
  • e3b548a: 8257736: InputStream from BodyPublishers.ofInputStream() leaks when IOE happens
  • ... and 376 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/c30fff7c329f1542c67df1500873ca663e7e3e70...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit bbac91a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@tstuefe tstuefe deleted the JDK-8257959-add-gtests-for-large-pages branch February 1, 2021 07:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants