Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8324983: race in CompileBroker::possibly_add_compiler_threads #17662

Closed

Conversation

tkrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor

@tkrodriguez tkrodriguez commented Jan 31, 2024

The number of active compiler threads is decremented before the compiler thread has actually activated so possibly_add_compiler_thread might start a new thread on the existing JavaThread. This adds a check that it's really exiting before proceeding and some new guarantees that ensure threads aren't started on top running threads.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8324983: Race in CompileBroker::possibly_add_compiler_threads (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17662/head:pull/17662
$ git checkout pull/17662

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17662
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17662/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17662

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17662

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17662.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 31, 2024

👋 Welcome back never! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 31, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 31, 2024

@tkrodriguez The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 31, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2024

@tkrodriguez This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8324983: race in CompileBroker::possibly_add_compiler_threads

Reviewed-by: kvn, dholmes, dnsimon

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 36 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 692c9f8: 8325201: (zipfs) Disable TestPosix.setPermissionsShouldConvertToUnix which fails on Windows
  • ed06846: 8325037: x86: enable and fix hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorization/TestRoundVectFloat.java
  • a18b03b: 8324635: (zipfs) Regression in Files.setPosixFilePermissions called on existing MSDOS entries
  • 7476e29: 8323680: SA PointerFinder code can do a better job of leveraging existing code to determine if an address is in the TLAB
  • 63cb1f8: 8321396: Retire test/jdk/java/util/zip/NoExtensionSignature.java
  • f613e13: 8313739: ZipOutputStream.close() should always close the wrapped stream
  • adc3604: 8325148: Enable restricted javac warning in java.base
  • 1ae8513: 8324858: [vectorapi] Bounds checking issues when accessing memory segments
  • 38c0197: 8318105: [jmh] the test java.security.HSS failed with 2 active threads
  • 6787c4c: 8325055: Rename Injector.h
  • ... and 26 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1733d2ea244756238c302d802511eb1557cd46ac...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 1, 2024
src/hotspot/share/runtime/javaThread.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/hotspot/share/runtime/javaThread.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tkrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dholmes-ora are you planning to approve or should I go ahead and integrate?

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update. Thumbs up on the shared changes.

@tkrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the reviews.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2024

Going to push as commit 1993652.
Since your change was applied there have been 49 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 5, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 5, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 5, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2024

@tkrodriguez Pushed as commit 1993652.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dougxc
Copy link
Member

dougxc commented Feb 6, 2024

Thanks @vnkozlov for approving the backport.

/backport jdk22

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2024

@dougxc the backport was successfully created on the branch backport-dougxc-19936526 in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk22. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk22:master, just click the following link:

➡️ Create pull request

The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 19936526 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Tom Rodriguez on 5 Feb 2024 and was reviewed by Vladimir Kozlov, David Holmes and Doug Simon.

Thanks!

If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk22:

$ git fetch https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk22.git backport-dougxc-19936526:backport-dougxc-19936526
$ git checkout backport-dougxc-19936526
# make changes
$ git add paths/to/changed/files
$ git commit --message 'Describe additional changes made'
$ git push https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk22.git backport-dougxc-19936526

⚠️ @dougxc You are not yet a collaborator in my fork openjdk-bots/jdk22. An invite will be sent out and you need to accept it before you can proceed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants