Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8325201: (zipfs) Disable TestPosix.setPermissionsShouldConvertToUnix which fails on Windows #17700

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

eirbjo
Copy link
Contributor

@eirbjo eirbjo commented Feb 4, 2024

Can I please get a review for this trivial change to disable the test TestPosix.setPermissionsShouldConvertToUnix on Windows?

This test was recently introduced in JDK-8324635, but fails intermittently on Windows CI runs. (See JDK-8325199)

To reduce CI noise, I suggest we simply disable this test on Windows for now. The actual fix of the failing test will be investigated and fixed as a follow-up PR.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8325201: (zipfs) Disable TestPosix.setPermissionsShouldConvertToUnix which fails on Windows (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17700/head:pull/17700
$ git checkout pull/17700

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17700
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17700/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17700

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17700

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17700.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 4, 2024

👋 Welcome back eirbjo! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2024

@eirbjo The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the nio nio-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 4, 2024
@eirbjo eirbjo changed the title 8324635: (zipfs) Disable TestPosix.setPermissionsShouldConvertToUnix which fails on Windows 8325201: (zipfs) Disable TestPosix.setPermissionsShouldConvertToUnix which fails on Windows Feb 4, 2024
@eirbjo eirbjo marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2024 16:31
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 4, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 4, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@LanceAndersen LanceAndersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Eirik,

I think disabling the tests makes sense for now or perhaps just disable for windows. Maybe add something like:
private static final boolean isWindows = System.getProperty("os.name") .startsWith("Windows");

And then have the test validate isWindows in the interim?

I think we should use a separate bug to disable the test and keep this bug open

@eirbjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

eirbjo commented Feb 4, 2024

I think we should use a separate PR to disable the test and keep this bug open

Lance,

I did create a separate issue for this PR to disable the test. We can keep the other bug open, yes. Or did I misunderstand something here..?

I’m not sure how to disable this test specially for Windows.

@LanceAndersen
Copy link
Contributor

I think we should use a separate PR to disable the test and keep this bug open

Lance,

I did create a separate issue for this PR to disable the test. We can keep the other bug open, yes. Or did I misunderstand something here..?

Hi Eirik,

Apologies for not being clearer

Sorry I missed that, thank you :-)

I’m not sure how to disable this test specially for Windows.

You could:
private static final boolean isWindows = System.getProperty("os.name") .startsWith("Windows");
and in the test:

if(isWindows) {
   return;  
}

You could also use the jtreg SkippedException

import jtreg.SkippedException;

if(isWindows) {
   throw new SkippedException("Running on windows, temporarily by-passing running this test");  
}

See the JTREG FAQ 4.34

@eirbjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

eirbjo commented Feb 4, 2024

Thanks Lance, I've pushed a commit which skips the test selectively on Windows. Since this test runs with a security manager, I needed to add a property read permission for os.name.

Copy link
Contributor

@LanceAndersen LanceAndersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the update Eirik, That looks good. I would also link this bug to the open bug in JBS when you have a moment,

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2024

@eirbjo This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325201: (zipfs) Disable TestPosix.setPermissionsShouldConvertToUnix which fails on Windows

Reviewed-by: lancea

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • ed06846: 8325037: x86: enable and fix hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorization/TestRoundVectFloat.java

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 4, 2024
@eirbjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

eirbjo commented Feb 4, 2024

I would also link this bug to the open bug in JBS when you have a moment

This bug, 8325201 already has a "related to" link to the open test failure bug JDK-8325199.

Does that look OK to you, or did you mean something else?

@eirbjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

eirbjo commented Feb 4, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2024

Going to push as commit 692c9f8.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • ed06846: 8325037: x86: enable and fix hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorization/TestRoundVectFloat.java

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2024

@eirbjo Pushed as commit 692c9f8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@LanceAndersen
Copy link
Contributor

I would also link this bug to the open bug in JBS when you have a moment

This bug, 8325201 already has a "related to" link to the open test failure bug JDK-8325199.

Does that look OK to you, or did you mean something else?

It looks fine, I checked before I submitted the approval so must have been a timing issue. Thank you for the above

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants