8325213: Flags introduced by configure script are not passed to ADLC build

[TheRealMDoerr]

A trivial ADLC build fix. The ADLC_LANGSTD_CXXFLAGS should get passed.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8325213: Flags introduced by configure script are not passed to ADLC build (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Julian Waters (@TheShermanTanker - Committer)
• Magnus Ihse Bursie (@magicus - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17705/head:pull/17705
$ git checkout pull/17705

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17705
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17705/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17705

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17705

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17705.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (1424d672)

[magicus]

LGTM. Thanks!

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325213: Flags introduced by configure script are not passed to ADLC build

Reviewed-by: jwaters, ihse

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• df35462: 8323502: javac crash with wrongly typed method block in Flow

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[TheRealMDoerr]

Thanks for the reviews!
/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 9ee9f28.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 729ae1d: 8325266: Enable this-escape javac warning in jdk.javadoc
• e0fd3f4: 8325081: Move '_soft_ref_policy' to 'CollectedHeap'
• f1f9398: 8323699: MessageFormat.toPattern() generates non-equivalent MessageFormat pattern
• ab3b941: 8325270: ProblemList two compiler/intrinsics/float16 tests that fail due to JDK-8324724
• f31957e: 8317636: Improve heap walking API tests to verify correctness of field indexes
• fd3042a: 8318566: Heap walking functions should not use FilteredFieldStream
• 209d87a: 8324960: Unsafe.allocateMemory documentation incorrect regarding zero return value
• 7777eb5: 8321931: memory_swap_current_in_bytes reports 0 as "unlimited"
• 51853f7: 8324724: Add Stub routines for FP16 conversions on aarch64
• c3adc61: 8325199: (zipfs) jdk/nio/zipfs/TestPosix.java failed 6 sub-tests
• ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/af32262c28f6dd012307c249156d909bb891e75b...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr Pushed as commit 9ee9f28.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.