Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8325517: Shenandoah: Reduce unnecessary includes from shenandoahControlThread.cpp #17778

Conversation

earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn commented Feb 8, 2024

The control thread used to run much more of the cycle directly. This code was all factored out into different classes, but many of the vestigial headers remained. Removing these improves compilation times and makes maintenance easier.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8325517: Shenandoah: Reduce unnecessary includes from shenandoahControlThread.cpp (Task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17778/head:pull/17778
$ git checkout pull/17778

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17778
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17778/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17778

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17778

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17778.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 8, 2024

👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 8, 2024

@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 8, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks generally okay. The usual rule of thumb is to see if any symbols from the include are actually used in the compilation unit. If used, keep the explicit header. Check this? At least one case is obvious from reading the code, see below.

Note that build might still succeed without the explicit header due to transitive header dependencies, but it is fragile and would yield build failures later.

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I only removed a couple of headers that were obviously not needed directly in the control thread (I think there are a couple more I can trim). I didn't try to find and declare all the direct/first-level dependencies (log.hpp, for example).

Copy link
Member

@ysramakrishna ysramakrishna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo Aleksey's suggestion on checking use of header file's content in compilation unit rather than relying on serendipitous (and fragile) transitive dependencies.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 8, 2024

@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325517: Shenandoah: Reduce unnecessary includes from shenandoahControlThread.cpp

Reviewed-by: shade, kdnilsen, ysr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 40708ba: 8325563: Remove unused Space::is_in
  • 29d89d4: 8325551: Remove unused obj_is_alive and block_start in Space
  • 8ef918d: 8324646: Avoid Class.forName in SecureRandom constructor
  • 69b2674: 8324648: Avoid NoSuchMethodError when instantiating NativePRNG
  • 52d4976: 8325437: Safepoint polling in monitor deflation can cause massive logs
  • 8b70b8d: 8325440: Confusing error reported for octal literals with wrong digits
  • 5daf622: 8325309: Amend "Listeners and Threads" in AWTThreadIssues.html
  • d165d12: 8325510: Serial: Remove redundant arg in non_clean_card_iterate
  • 71b46c3: 8325471: CHeapBitMap(MEMFLAGS flags) constructor misleading use of super-constructor
  • e3dc6a7: 8314275: Incorrect stepping in switch
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/10beb3184e14e2714cd836029680a8b2d3fd5011...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev, @ysramakrishna) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 8, 2024
@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Feb 9, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2024

@earthling-amzn
Your change (at version 52272b9) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

shipilev commented Feb 9, 2024

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Going to push as commit 4a3a38d.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 40708ba: 8325563: Remove unused Space::is_in
  • 29d89d4: 8325551: Remove unused obj_is_alive and block_start in Space
  • 8ef918d: 8324646: Avoid Class.forName in SecureRandom constructor
  • 69b2674: 8324648: Avoid NoSuchMethodError when instantiating NativePRNG
  • 52d4976: 8325437: Safepoint polling in monitor deflation can cause massive logs
  • 8b70b8d: 8325440: Confusing error reported for octal literals with wrong digits
  • 5daf622: 8325309: Amend "Listeners and Threads" in AWTThreadIssues.html
  • d165d12: 8325510: Serial: Remove redundant arg in non_clean_card_iterate
  • 71b46c3: 8325471: CHeapBitMap(MEMFLAGS flags) constructor misleading use of super-constructor
  • e3dc6a7: 8314275: Incorrect stepping in switch
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/10beb3184e14e2714cd836029680a8b2d3fd5011...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 9, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 9, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Feb 9, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2024

@shipilev @earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 4a3a38d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants