-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8325517: Shenandoah: Reduce unnecessary includes from shenandoahControlThread.cpp #17778
8325517: Shenandoah: Reduce unnecessary includes from shenandoahControlThread.cpp #17778
Conversation
👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks generally okay. The usual rule of thumb is to see if any symbols from the include are actually used in the compilation unit. If used, keep the explicit header. Check this? At least one case is obvious from reading the code, see below.
Note that build might still succeed without the explicit header due to transitive header dependencies, but it is fragile and would yield build failures later.
I only removed a couple of headers that were obviously not needed directly in the control thread (I think there are a couple more I can trim). I didn't try to find and declare all the direct/first-level dependencies ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good modulo Aleksey's suggestion on checking use of header file's content in compilation unit rather than relying on serendipitous (and fragile) transitive dependencies.
@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev, @ysramakrishna) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
/integrate |
@earthling-amzn |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 4a3a38d.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@shipilev @earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 4a3a38d. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The control thread used to run much more of the cycle directly. This code was all factored out into different classes, but many of the vestigial headers remained. Removing these improves compilation times and makes maintenance easier.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17778/head:pull/17778
$ git checkout pull/17778
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17778
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17778/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17778
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17778
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17778.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment