Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8325574: Shenandoah: Simplify and enhance reporting of requested GCs #17795

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn commented Feb 9, 2024

Shenandoah distinguishes between 'implicit' and 'explicit' GC requests. The distinction is used to decide whether or not a request is serviced concurrently or with a full GC. The data collected is also included in the end-of-process report. This change simplifies handling of these requests and adds a tally of the underlying GC causes to the end-of-process report.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8325574: Shenandoah: Simplify and enhance reporting of requested GCs (Task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17795/head:pull/17795
$ git checkout pull/17795

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17795
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17795/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17795

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17795

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17795.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 9, 2024

👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 9, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2024

@earthling-amzn The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 9, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@ysramakrishna ysramakrishna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2024

@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325574: Shenandoah: Simplify and enhance reporting of requested GCs

Reviewed-by: ysr, kdnilsen, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 77 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 9, 2024
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The simplification in ShenandoahControlThread::run_service looks very nice. I think we can make the code more straight-forward:

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with minor nits.

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Going to push as commit b823fa4.
Since your change was applied there have been 77 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 14, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 14, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 14, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 14, 2024

@earthling-amzn Pushed as commit b823fa4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn deleted the count-gc-causes branch February 16, 2024 19:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants