JDK-8325650: Table of contents scroll timeout not long enough

[hns]

Please review a simple change to increase a timeout value for suppression of scroll-following in the table of contents. This should have no visible effects to the user but may avoid flickering of the table of contents on slower computers. I also replaced a normal inequality operator (!=) with a strict one (!==) which is better practice when comparing equal types.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8325650: Table of contents scroll timeout not long enough (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Jonathan Gibbons (@jonathan-gibbons - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17811/head:pull/17811
$ git checkout pull/17811

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17811
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17811/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17811

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17811

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17811.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back hannesw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@hns The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (97814c1e)

[openjdk]

@hns This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325650: Table of contents scroll timeout not long enough

Reviewed-by: jjg

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 34 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• c266800: 8325558: Add jcheck whitespace checking for properties files
• ec20b0a: 8325626: Allow selection of non-matching configurations using CONF=!string
• 618af39: 8325633: Use stricter assertion in callers of Space::is_aligned
• 5dbf137: 8319797: Recursive lightweight locking: Runtime implementation
• 4513da9: 8325470: [AIX] use fclose after fopen in read_psinfo
• 62a4be0: 8325635: Serial: Inline verify_used_region_at_save_marks
• b356fee: 8325458: Rename mlvmJvmtiUtils.h
• 2ed889b: 8323628: Update license on "pass-through" files
• 7c69712: 8325570: Update to Graphviz 9.0.0
• 482c100: 8322865: JavaDoc fails on aggregator modules
• ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/29d89d48cb32a225f94b2ed45d2a1467add33b68...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[hns]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 088e54f.
Since your change was applied there have been 34 commits pushed to the master branch:

• c266800: 8325558: Add jcheck whitespace checking for properties files
• ec20b0a: 8325626: Allow selection of non-matching configurations using CONF=!string
• 618af39: 8325633: Use stricter assertion in callers of Space::is_aligned
• 5dbf137: 8319797: Recursive lightweight locking: Runtime implementation
• 4513da9: 8325470: [AIX] use fclose after fopen in read_psinfo
• 62a4be0: 8325635: Serial: Inline verify_used_region_at_save_marks
• b356fee: 8325458: Rename mlvmJvmtiUtils.h
• 2ed889b: 8323628: Update license on "pass-through" files
• 7c69712: 8325570: Update to Graphviz 9.0.0
• 482c100: 8322865: JavaDoc fails on aggregator modules
• ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/29d89d48cb32a225f94b2ed45d2a1467add33b68...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@hns Pushed as commit 088e54f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.